No, not quite correct.Please, VA1 milked VFF even though it was 'in a trust'.... remember the 'loan' from VFF to VA1? Ahem....
Bain will get whatever they want out of VFF.
Bain cannot unilaterally alter the trust deed governing VFF. The loan to VA has/was paid out in full with the settlement including interest I read. So VFF remains 100% cash backed where as QFF has no cash backing requirement, zero, zilch, nada. As Q looks to have negative Net Tangible Assets (as preliminary results release showed less than 5 weeks operating cash burn left in NTA on pg3) - VFF looks by far the safest scheme - let's hope late next week we start to have some more detail of the future VFF.
Next week will finally start to provide some answers about VA MkII and clear away much of the recent mis-information that has been swirling around.
If Bain want to make a clear distinction between themselves & Q, they could issue a media release along these lines next week (copyright held by me of course!):
"Virgin Australia is proud to announce that now that we have come through the other side we will not be 'enhancing' our service by removing staff in airports. We will continue to have real people providing the VA service you've come to enjoy since we were first established.
With our much younger fleet using one of the world's highest rated 'on-time' aircraft we look forward to seeing you onboard soon. Whilst CV will limit what we can do immediately, rest assured the VA approach to travel will be there with you in the future.
Over coming weeks we will be announcing a range of exciting developments that will benefit you, our staff and the community.
We live in interesting times and all our wonderful staff will be doing our utmost to pay you back for your unswerving support through these trying times."
Or I could be wrong.