Virgin Bart
Established Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Posts
- 1,575
AFF, I am going to sue you for 15 minutes back please.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Your status also means diddly squat. The status to have is the one you cannot earn, namely CL. Kind of like royal titles.... just because you buy a square foot of some derelict scotish castle does not make you a HRH.
Can I join you? We can split the lawyers' costs.AFF, I am going to sue you for 15 minutes back please.
Enough to be barred? I've raised my voice when I can see they've stuffed up and refused to do anything about it. You can't deal calmly with someone who does not acknowledge they've stuffed up.So you took it out on lounge staff, that likely that had nothing to do with causing your problems?
You would be surprised!...
if you want a home truth, half the people on here are either lying or over exaggerating their status.
...
Whilst Adelaide has some wealthy people, no major company that would warrant so much travel is based there ...
Same here I am also VA Platinum now but have not taken one flight to get it.You would be surprised!
I happen to know a person who is a member of this forum and run's their own company. They reside in Adelaide but have permanent accommodation in Melbourne with a frequent commute between the cities. They are indeed both Qantas Platinum One and Velocity Platinum, gaining such with SC maximisation strategies appropriately applied.
For example, elsewhere in this forum there is information alluding to how to earn half of the Qantas Platinum SC's re-qualification requirement for under $1500 with about a dozen flights. I myself have done that this year.
And, yes, with such strategy, I am both Qantas and Velocity Platinum having gained Qantas Life time Gold a decade ago.
But in typical left wing fashion... when they treat you badly and you kick back, its YOU that has the problem.
Ok. I agreed with some of your points earlier but this post has gone way way too far. And now, this is a “puerile Internet forum” yet here you are, posting on it.I "was" WP. Having flown QF a big fat ZERO times in my last membership year, I've defaulted back to lifetime gold.
its rather ironic how you're chastising me for a seemingly false sense of entitlement and yet here you are you boasting about holding the highest status in every airline alliance going. like that is supposed to somehow validate your opinions as if they were fact?
and quit with the self deprecating "im just a novice traveller" BS........
if you want a home truth, half the people on here are either lying or over exaggerating their status. I know how much I flew when earning between 2000-2400 credits per year and how hard/time consuming it was. for you to earn all the status's you claim to have, you'd pretty much live on planes and have no time for work or family and definitely no time to be trawling a puerile internet forum. also... if you were as important as you claim to be, either you or your employer would be flying you on a private jet and not on commercial airlines..... but sure.... you go and keep earning your status's "year on year" and keep thinking that makes you a better and more important person.
Your status also means diddly squat. The status to have is the one you cannot earn, namely CL. Kind of like royal titles.... just because you buy a square foot of some derelict scotish castle does not make you a HRH.
Whilst Adelaide has some wealthy people, no major company that would warrant so much travel is based there, and the people who are truly wealthy, like the Gerard's, have a private jet and dont waste their very precious and valuable time on internet forums. unless of course you're using wifi half way across the pacific in a First class cabin that has been fully booked by you (or your employer) so as to not be disturbed by former WP riff riff such as myself.
...
OK OK, I'll ask about the possible elephant in the room - Was the consumption of alcohol involved!?
There are some very wealthy private companies here that would not even be publically known.
my response to the seat reassignment was simply that I refused to travel in the reassigned seat. I made it clear I had a valid seat selection, and if they couldn't provide me with a reason as to why it was taken away, then I expect to be in that seat. Had they said it was broken, or there was a wheelchair passenger that needed it, or it was a bassinet seat (which it was not) I would been totally fine with that.
Just don’t go there. We are slowly reversing bad decisions made with apparent good intent. I’m being charitable today.Sorry off topic but maybe you could them to invest in a new Northern Coal Power station in SA and fix the baseload electricity problems/power prices that renewables are falling well short of providing
I know just being frivolous and trying to warm the day up,.Just don’t go there. We are slowly reversing bad decisions made with apparent good intent. I’m being charitable today.