And then of course there are 15 Michelin starred restaurants in London using Nespresso machines and more than 100 Michelin starred restaurants in France..
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/baristas-are-going-obsolete-2015-6?r=US&IR=T
"
It’s not surprising when you think about it that a vacuum-sealed dose of perfectly ground beans run through a finely tuned machine would beat a drink that was subject to endless human error
"
People are funny creatures....
I am not surprised that those restaurants have replaced the barista with pods. For the kind of patronage they get, a decent, strong brew is sufficient, even at the three star level. After all, it
is the food and experience, and I would be willing to bet nearly all Michelin inspectors wouldn't have a palate for coffee anyway.
The culture of coffee in Europe is very different to that in Australia and New Zealand, the latter of which has evolved to something very far removed from the roots of espresso and very particular compared to the rest of the world. One also has to remember that milk coffees like flat whites and lattes are very much Australian / New Zealand inventions; the reception of those kinds of drinks in most of Europe is either one of amusement or aghast, cf. most Europeans have their coffee black (and short).
This is likely why most Australians might complain in Europe that they have to search high and low for a "decent coffee" (with possible exception of the UK, more specifically London).
A blind taste test of pure espresso with no additions would be difficult to split between a pod and an average barista. A good barista should still be able to do better, although if you take into account that different pods offer slightly different taste profiles (assuming this is real and not marketing spin, a la Neurofen tablets), that's a slightly different challenge. I don't know why, but between a milk coffee (like a flat white) made by a good barista and a pod coffee with added steamed milk from the supplementary unit, I find largely that the former one has more depth than the latter. It could well be psychosomatic.
All said and done, I have found Nespresso - for most part - quite acceptable to drink, but I prefer the stronger blends, and will normally have it either straight or with only a dash of milk or milk foam (and in Europe, possibly with a dash of coffee cream). A Nespresso machine would reduce a lot of "pressure" on the barista, i.e. not every place will have a suitably skilled barista, so a good machine removes a lot of that need or variance, even if it sacrifices on the ability to achieve the best output (and to what degree that difference is is debatable).
VA passengers shouldn't be so surprised in a way; they have had Nespresso for some time now as it has been served in J on board.
One has to wonder if making espresso is more scientific than an art form, why has it taken
so long to invent an effective machine that can rival the best human baristas, the latter of which we now admit are "inconsistent due to endless human error"? We all know the horrors of having to drink the insipid, watery coffee that came from those robot baristas in the QF domestic lounges many years ago.