Bonza Airline Discussion

MCY-CNS on JQ could probably be timed to connect into the KIX/NRT bank on certain days

(Although one way i.e connect outbound towards KIX/NRT on Mon/Wed, and inbound towards MCY on Tue/Thur).
 
don't fully understand 777P / AIP model but it seems to partially be a Berkshire Hathaway / Buffet play in using insurer/ reinsurer funds to invest in higher yielding (and higher risk).assets
Boom
 
Was just cleaning out my junk mail, and noticed an email from Bonza from two weeks ago with the below heading. Prophetic. They knew it was their "final days" but were still selling? 🤣

1715000474814.png
 
This was on my Facebook feed, they are literally blocking the whole aircraft now.

But who is doing this? If the lessor has repossessed them? Why do they need to block them off? What’s the airline going to do? Fly them off somewhere? They are not Bonza’s. What the heck is Bonza doing to do with them? Worried the administrator will take them perhaps?

Or is this MCY airport doing this due unpaid bills?

View attachment 383208
Ironic how the airplane is called Sheilla
Post automatically merged:

Was just cleaning out my junk mail, and noticed an email from Bonza from two weeks ago with the below heading. Prophetic. They knew it was their "final days" but were still selling? 🤣

View attachment 383752
Got to pull The Inside Man (while dancing on a moving train and singing Chaiyya Chaiyya)
 
Probably not just the degree of risk, but the "lumpy" nature of potential claims. Most travel insurance incidents are relatively regular and affect a relatively small number of people for each one (a plane load or two being about the maximum). The regularity means that the cost of claims can be factored into the cashflow, and likely covered. Things that come much less regularly but are catastrophic are much more problematic.

General insurers deal with this by using reinsurance - they will take the first $x million exposure pre event, and pay reinsurers to cover the rest. Whilst a bushfire or earthquake here might be infrequent and expensive, there are fires, earthquakes, floods, tsunamis around the world on a somewhat regular basis, so reinsurers can handle it.

On a more practical note, unless actually stranded mid-trip, using a credit card to purchase tickets offers some coverage. At least you can get your money back for the ticket. Doesn't help for lost accommodation, purchasing a more expensive replacement or other inconvenience, but at least it is something.

Those policies that do cover insolvency of providers seem to place a cap on the liability - which is a lot less than the potential medical expenses on a single claim basis, but obviously adds up. They also contain conditions that you need to pursue other avenues to receive refunds etc. - so they will be pushing lots of people down the credit card charge back route as well.
Technically not entitled to a refund because Qantas is providing them rescue flights so the flight is technically "transferred" to Qantas. If they do that they have to tell the CC companies that they got their service and then the CC company will then decide whether to reimburse them or not. There is no such thing as a free lunch 🤣 🤣
 
In March it seems 777 Partners cracked it and advised its internal reps to ‘wind it up’. Interesting that Bonza management was not aware of this and only got wind of it via a email leak. Then it was pretty much all mayhem after that.

Another article mentioned the original plan was intended as a LCC operating 72 seat ATRs. I guess that might have worked (?)

Seems like it was the airline that was never meant to be. Not sure why it even started.

 
Last edited:
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Another article mentioned the original plan was intended as a LCC operating 72 seat ATRs. I guess that might have worked (?)

Seems like it was the airline that was never meant to be. Not sure why it even started.
Even a small jet might have worked. The 737 always seemed too big for what they were doing.
 
Court documents reveal that Bonza has around 58,000 forward bookings.

At full capacity, that would fill around 312 flights. For context, Bonza have been scheduling around 800+ sectors per month.

No wonder 777 wanted to pull the plug...

Source: https://www.news.com.au/travel/that-would-require-a-stadium-number-of-customer-caught-up-in-bonza-collapse-revealed/news-story/7d08b3ed047e895c3fffee11600d16ac?am
Considering the Bonza loads, that would probably be around a month worth of passengers.

They only had bookings available until September from memory.

That does seem to be a real alarmingly low number of forward bookings however. I guess heading into winter sort of expected when you look at their route network.
 
Ask ZL, they have the answer.
I would also be surprised if ZL does not regularly investigate potential airport pairs.

Whether they have spare Saabs and aircrew is another question. Pity they are not in production any more
I was actually thinking Air North that seems to have eeked out a niche.
 
The shorter low pax routes are likely first for electric aircraft, but it's still a few years awaym
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top