Having an offshore hub will actually allow Qantas to decentralise, by having multiple flights from decentralised cities flying to the hub location, just like SQ etc already do out of Australia. Of course to do this they do need aircraft smaller than A380's or 747's, in fact the 787's would be ideal.3. Decentralisation - as many here point out, they havent really tacked the core issue that has cost them market share - Sydney-centricity. Why anyone flying out of BNE would go BNE-SYD-SIN-LHR-EU destination when they can go BNE-SIN-xx or BNE-SUH-xx or BNE-DXB-xx is really telling. Better options ex-BNE is vital and this is the market share being stolen - not ex-MEL or SYD. PER is another example of this - why go PER-SIN-LHR-EU when you could go PER-DXB-xx. Similarly PER-SYD-LAX-xx when you could go PER-HKG-xx directly. There's lots of examples, and the 788/789 is the right plane to decentralise this - if they can leverage their MH partenship, or better work with CX this might happen. Instead they've decided to keep funneling pax via transit points they dont want. The addition of a "hubbed" premium non-QF QF in Asia wont help this feeling. I'd like to have seen 380s out of SYD/BNE/MEL and 788s out of ADL/PER/CNS into say SIN allowing the 380s to continue to LHR/FRA and the 789s to other EU destinations. The "Premium" non-QF airline will also need to be class leading - pax in Asia will not choose QF just because it's QF - and this airline will still be seen as QF.