Why don't we have this kind of discussion about other discount carriers?
The problem as I see it with JQ (Dom or Int) is that it will be forever viewed as QantasLite. If you're at a regional airport and flying JQ then this perception is most visible when the checkin, baggage and ground crew are all QF staff. And this story furthers this belief.
Rather than acknowledging this perception and embracing it, QF seem hell-bent on ignoring it. The cynic in me suggests that's because JQ will be sold off at some time in the (not too distant) future and QF wish to distance themselves from JQ, in an operational sense, as a much as possible.
However, there are many things that could be done to improve the service at JQ utilising the capabilities of QF. Given they're largely operating similar equipment on similar routes what bugs people the most?
For someone that is largely forced to travel JQ domestically to visit family (MEL-LST) and QF the other half of the journey (PER-MEL due to PER-AVV with JQ) I'm annoyed by the lack of interlining. I've already proven it's possible to check baggage through from PER-LST with a mixed QF/JQ itinerary - so why isn't Qantas utilising this ability?!? Surely it would mean lower costs (don't have to check me in twice - don't have to double handle baggage) and greater interoperability between the two airlines.
[Edit - a 2nd thought] If JQ wish to operate a true point-to-point LCC model why aren't all Melbourne flights out of either Tullamarine or Avalon? Because QF wish to double-dip. They want to hand low-profit, short haul routes over to JQ (MEL-LST-HBA), while still allowing connection the more profitable high capacity routes on the mainline (MEL-SYD-BNE).
I have no problem flying JQ otherwise on shorthaul flights (I've managed to avoid anything longer than an hour and a half) and other issues have been resolved over time (allocated seating etc). If we're going to be seeing a lot more of JQ as a QF subsiduary in our skies surely they should maximise its potential as an LCC rather than give in to negative perceptions?
Cheers,
jaX
The problem as I see it with JQ (Dom or Int) is that it will be forever viewed as QantasLite. If you're at a regional airport and flying JQ then this perception is most visible when the checkin, baggage and ground crew are all QF staff. And this story furthers this belief.
Rather than acknowledging this perception and embracing it, QF seem hell-bent on ignoring it. The cynic in me suggests that's because JQ will be sold off at some time in the (not too distant) future and QF wish to distance themselves from JQ, in an operational sense, as a much as possible.
However, there are many things that could be done to improve the service at JQ utilising the capabilities of QF. Given they're largely operating similar equipment on similar routes what bugs people the most?
For someone that is largely forced to travel JQ domestically to visit family (MEL-LST) and QF the other half of the journey (PER-MEL due to PER-AVV with JQ) I'm annoyed by the lack of interlining. I've already proven it's possible to check baggage through from PER-LST with a mixed QF/JQ itinerary - so why isn't Qantas utilising this ability?!? Surely it would mean lower costs (don't have to check me in twice - don't have to double handle baggage) and greater interoperability between the two airlines.
[Edit - a 2nd thought] If JQ wish to operate a true point-to-point LCC model why aren't all Melbourne flights out of either Tullamarine or Avalon? Because QF wish to double-dip. They want to hand low-profit, short haul routes over to JQ (MEL-LST-HBA), while still allowing connection the more profitable high capacity routes on the mainline (MEL-SYD-BNE).
I have no problem flying JQ otherwise on shorthaul flights (I've managed to avoid anything longer than an hour and a half) and other issues have been resolved over time (allocated seating etc). If we're going to be seeing a lot more of JQ as a QF subsiduary in our skies surely they should maximise its potential as an LCC rather than give in to negative perceptions?
Cheers,
jaX
Last edited: