Bushfires 2019/2020!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Charities such as the Red Cross are under fire by very upset people who desperate for the assistance they have collected.
But how do respective charities cope with a sudden overwhelming wind fall of donations with only existing staff to ensure that they get the money to the right people. It’s almost as if there needs to be a particular training for specialists to join these organisations in times of extreme emergency to evaluate and appropriately act very quickly.
 
Charities such as the Red Cross are under fire by very upset people who desperate for the assistance they have collected.
But how do respective charities cope with a sudden overwhelming wind fall of donations with only existing staff to ensure that they get the money to the right people. It’s almost as if there needs to be a particular training for specialists to join these organisations in times of extreme emergency to evaluate and appropriately act very quickly.

The news story last night suggested that they are holding onto IIRC approximately 60% of the funds for administration costs and future disasters.
 
Charities such as the Red Cross are under fire by very upset people who desperate for the assistance they have collected.
But how do respective charities cope with a sudden overwhelming wind fall of donations with only existing staff to ensure that they get the money to the right people. It’s almost as if there needs to be a particular training for specialists to join these organisations in times of extreme emergency to evaluate and appropriately act very quickly.
The news story last night suggested that they are holding onto IIRC approximately 60% of the funds for administration costs and future disasters.
Good points but I heard they have done this previously and it’s been reported in the media it’s for ”future contingencies”. They’ve handed out only 1/3rd of the money. I would have thought their role was for immediate emergency relief and not for future re-establishment. That is the work of Governments and Insurance companies.

I donated to a local agency in KI because I don’t like handing money out to large institutions.
 
The news story last night suggested that they are holding onto IIRC approximately 60% of the funds for administration costs and future disasters.

which is par for the course for many charities
Post automatically merged:

My clear expectation is that if I donate to a bush fire appeal it gets used for that emergency.

I guess that maybe there needs to be some kind of (legally enforced) indication of what % of your donation will be gobbled up in admin expenses, I think it would be unreasonable to expect 100% of your (our) donation to get through unscathed by admin costs
 
Australia's highest-earning Velocity Frequent Flyer credit card: Offer expires: 21 Jan 2025
- Earn 60,000 bonus Velocity Points
- Get unlimited Virgin Australia Lounge access
- Enjoy a complimentary return Virgin Australia domestic flight each year

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Good to see Twiggy Forest stepping up agaiun to try and take the p;olitics out of this whole debate around climate change and the Bush fires, in spite of the identity politics brigade trying to bring him down. (a little off piste i know, but thought it deserved a mention)
 
But 60% is really on the high side for costs.Future emergencies were not what people were donating for.It was this emergency.
60% of costs on Admin etc is what our hospitals spend their salaries on.Only 40% on all Clinical staff.As the first Bundaberg inquiry was told if the could reduce it to what a private business can do,~20%,they could double the number of doctors,nurses,physios etc.
About time these large charities were publicly scrutinised.
 
I understand admin costs. What I don't like is money I donated for bushfires being used for other emergencies including overseas. From what I understand a good percentage of donations get used for ongoing work in third world countries where they have staff based continuously. Hence why I direct my donations to small local charities.
 
I thought his idea was a good one, no matter what he personally thinks. As long as all sides were brought into it and the various sides felt they were getting a fair go. Otherwise, a waste of money. He says he needs $500m at least to be raised. Hopefully, the impost can be breached.


Good to see Twiggy Forest stepping up agaiun to try and take the p;olitics out of this whole debate around climate change and the Bush fires, in spite of the identity politics brigade trying to bring him down. (a little off piste i know, but thought it deserved a mention)
 
Last edited:
Realistically though, we hope that ‘professional’ people need to administer all this money. Not all of it can go towards charity.
It’s one of the main reasons I don’t donate to people like Red Cross. Yes they do need administrators etc, but the proportion that gets retained is too rich for me. I do sponsor a child through Smith Family and just grit my teeth and know the overheads are high, but do it anyway. On the whole though I do as direct as I can to avoid all the padding.

SIL was working for a charity - they were running aged care and providing packages for in place aged people, plus general charity. So they set up a house maintenance and garden maintenance business and it did that plus trying to get a landscaping business going to raise extra money.

He quit after 2 years as he said the unnecessary overheads of all the extra staff to do admin was driving him crazy and made it impossible to run it at a profit. He felt it was more about cushy jobs for the staff than anything else.
 
Red Cross has responded to criticism. Story in the Oz, which is pay walled and I can’t paste now. Basically denying that Some bush fire funds are being stockpiled for future disasters, but not totally convincing to me. Will probably be on ABC later ( not presently).
 
The news story last night suggested that they are holding onto IIRC approximately 60% of the funds for administration costs and future disasters.

60% does seem on the high side, but I’m not opposed to a small proportion of money being held for future bushfires at least..

There will no doubt be some small bushfires next summer (hopefully they will only be small). There might affect a community and a dozen houses. There will be no major international social media driven campaigns to aid them with charity. Who’s going to look after them? I suppose on a smaller scale, the government and others in that same community can.
 
The Red Cross says that since July 2019, funds will only be spent in Aus. There is a lot of misinformation around, eg SkyNews saying only a 1/3 of money being used for charity; other sources reverse that. The RC says 10% will go on "necessary" costs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top