AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
My tenants in CBR tell me the ACs are now playing up due to smoke and the drapes and carpet smell and will need cleaning. Looking at flights but might wait a while longer
Evaporative is outside air, and reverse cycle uses the inside air.If they have aircon why is the smoke allowed to get in? Do the filters require cleaning,? I have been keeping the house closed to the poisonous outside air and there's no appreciable problem. There has been dust as well as smoke though. Is it reverse cycle or evaporative cooling which needs to draw in air from outside?
My tenants in CBR tell me the ACs are now playing up due to smoke and the drapes and carpet smell and will need cleaning. Looking at flights but might wait a while longer
I would wait at least until after the weekend - it’s supposed to be bad.My tenants in CBR tell me the ACs are now playing up due to smoke and the drapes and carpet smell and will need cleaning. Looking at flights but might wait a while longer
That’s crazy - I have hardly opened a door or window all month. You have to do that with evaporative but otherwise it’s a pointless exercise and especially stupid with smoke around!Neighbour advises the tenants have been leaving patio doors open upstairs .. and running ACs ...
Evaporative is outside air, and reverse cycle uses the inside air.
The joys of being landlord in the ACT. And the ACT "government" just changed the law to provide tenants further rights... AC are RC so filter clean should fix. More worried about smoke damage to furnishings... oh well there's a bond in place. See what weekend holds. Apparently they told neighbour before he went down the coast they thought leaving patio doors open upstairs would "let the smoke out...."
I thought one of the problems they were having with prescribed burns was that the window where they could safely do it was getting shorter because of longer summers/hotter springs. I read something from one of the National Park managers last year but can’t find it at the moment. The shorter window limited the amount of burning they could do rather than a deliberate decision not to do it?Have been looking for this graph.
View attachment 202036.
In 1961 WA had serious fatal fires in the South west.The Royal commission recommended a big increase in Hazard Reduction burns and to theit credit this was done-the Green line on the graph.
The area burnt by bushfires dropped.but as the HRBs reduced bushfires returned until again in 2018 the South west burnt again.
Prescribed burns fall but fires soar across SW
The amount of land across the South West destroyed by bushfires has soared this decade after years of faltering efforts to keep the threat of uncontrolled blazes under wraps.thewest.com.au
Yes about 2% n NSW - I just found this page. Presumably in order to do more they would need a lot more resources given to them, given the narrow window that they mention.Not so.Look at the graph the fall off was from 1980 in HRBs.
In NSW the target of HZBs is ridiculously low-less than 2% of National Parks area.So 50 years of fuel build up.
And real; life in East Gippsland in 2018-
View attachment 202042.
That used to be up on the ABC website until a week or so ago.And these are the people who should have a long look at themselves.
View attachment 202043.
View attachment 202044.
View attachment 202045.
Have been looking for this graph.
View attachment 202036.
In 1961 WA had serious fatal fires in the South west.The Royal commission recommended a big increase in Hazard Reduction burns and to theit credit this was done-the Green line on the graph.
The area burnt by bushfires dropped.but as the HRBs reduced bushfires returned until again in 2018 the South west burnt again.
Prescribed burns fall but fires soar across SW
The amount of land across the South West destroyed by bushfires has soared this decade after years of faltering efforts to keep the threat of uncontrolled blazes under wraps.thewest.com.au
just been reading that - it seems fairly pragmatic - rather than get into a fight to the death about climate change it looks at prescribed burns as a way of reducing fires whatever the other factors are. Hopefully after this disastrous summer more resources will be put into enabling that.As a supplement, I'll draw particular attention to this recent article by Roger Underwood: The Eastern States Bushfires 2019 – Bushfire Front
Says it all, in my view...
It seems a
just been reading that - it seems fairly pragmatic - rather than get into a fight to the death about climate change it looks at prescribed burns as a way of reducing fires whatever the other factors are. Hopefully after this disastrous summer more resources will be put into enabling that.