Which is exactly what I wrote in my
previous post.
But I still consider them very similar. And no, I consider this deal created based on what I call bad faith (as in opposite of good faith).
And no, I don't have time to deal with this BS. I have enough bank accounts to manage, plus the credit cards to churn thru, plus all the direct debits to link when I churn card, then all the complexity of merging all the transactions from all these cards and accounts back into my booking keeping which I do (I let me accountant do the reportings, but I do my own book keeping).
I am not going to let ING muck with these tricks, on top of, the products from ING are stupid, and you try doing loans and investments from ING, and see how far you get (answer is you won't get very far, they are as useless as all the new banks which came from being a CU or building society). All for a saving a few dollars?!
Citi can do all these for you, and if they want to do a deal, they would do a straight forward deal. Citi is simple, you just need to put up with coughpy customer service for your low level enquiries, not how many times you have to run to Coles.