[Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26] was 10April

[opusman]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

I don't think the concept of reading the thread content to find out not to use MASA is all that difficult either. As such masa in the title shouldn't confuse anyone doing their research properly.

I guess it depends whether you believe that this community exists to help people or to make things harder for them...

 

[Deleted User]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

I guess it depends whether you believe that this community exists to help people or to make things harder for them...

How about looking at the positive side...? :shock: The new thread (although originally with the erroneous "MASA" terminology) is a great "summary" of BOOKINGS ALREADY MADE...so has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ACTUAL BOOKING PROCESS...

How about you stop criticising about a small clerical issue, and be more constructive & helpful to the AFF community with additional input other than complaining. If you don't like the thread I created that's unfortunate I guess, but I am sure many others will be thankful of me taking the time to create it...

Anyway, you have clearly voiced your complaint now, and of course I could have said "why didn't you create the thread in the first place, that way I could complain about you", but I'm of the opinion that nobody's perfect, even you

Lets all just move on now please, the thread is what it is, nothing more, nothing less, either use it / refer to it, or not...

 

[MEL_Traveller]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

Selecting ASA's online was just so easy to do at ones leisure, able to compare and find flights and all in view, the removal and having to go find Classic, then call up is just an inconvenience with many operators are still not trained, which then makes it frustrating. Surely can't be that hard to have it back online, but looks now to be done with.

one of the advantages if NOT having status any award seat I see available as a classic should be available to me as an mASA... none of this phantom availability that is open to thems with status

 

[JessicaTam]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

How about looking at the positive side...? :shock: The new thread (although originally with the erroneous "MASA" terminology) is a great "summary" of BOOKINGS ALREADY MADE...so has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ACTUAL BOOKING PROCESS...

How about you stop criticising about a small clerical issue, and be more constructive & helpful to the AFF community with additional input other than complaining. If you don't like the thread I created that's unfortunate I guess, but I am sure many others will be thankful of me taking the time to create it...

Anyway, you have clearly voiced your complaint now, and of course I could have said "why didn't you create the thread in the first place, that way I could complain about you", but I'm of the opinion that nobody's perfect, even you

Lets all just move on now please, the thread is what it is, nothing more, nothing less, either use it / refer to it, or not...

The trouble with a "successful bookings" thread, is that it is often the first place that people will look, to see what is available and at what cost. I have been looking for AA and LM bookings in the respective "success" thread before booking one. So it is natural that a reader would pick up on the terminology used. I think it is good that 'marginal' is not in the thread title, and we should limit its use elsewhere without some form of explanation. The majority of QF CSAs are not aware of it, nor does it appear in the Right on Q info sheet they have.

We could use xASA (as opposed to XASA), UASA, CLASA (CLassic Any Seat Award). Even JASA is still viable as an acronym.

 

[Deleted User]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

Thread title has / was / is changed to the following [h=2]Sucessful ASA Bookings booked at classic rates Reference Guide[/h]
So its not an issue so lets move on people...

 

[straitman]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

Thread title has / was / is changed to the following [h=2]Sucessful ASA Bookings booked at classic rates Reference Guide[/h]
So its not an issue so lets move on people...

I agree with shintaro10x.

Time to move on :!:

 

[Limewood]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

Yep, looks like the cause is lost, so back to the MASA lottery.

 

[blu]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

As it's now into the 3rd month, any ideas as to continued availability of telephone M/JASA in October, or will it end on 30 September?
It will influence my itinerary.

 

[legroom]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

As it's now into the 3rd month, any ideas as to continued availability of telephone M/JASA in October, or will it end on 30 September?
It will influence my itinerary.

See this post upthread

"for the forseeable future".

Your guess is as good as anyone's.

 

[cove]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

Getting to the AFL grand final on points sees us doing a longcut thru Brisbane then on to Melbourne from Perth. Got business class for two so it isn't too bad.

 

[Buzzard]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

Thread title has / was / is changed to the following Sucessful ASA Bookings booked at classic rates Reference Guide


So its not an issue so lets move on people...

I don't care what the thread was/is called. I'm just thankful that somebody (shintaro10x) has actually started such a great resource tool.
Thank you shintaro10x.

 

[JohnK]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

Why should you begrudge (or indeed, see it differently) people earning status on ASA's?

Why does it matter what I think? Everyone thinks I am the villain here. Why?

I have an opinion that some here do not necessarily agree with. I do not like Any Seat awards earning SCs and QFF points. Never did. Right from the start. I do not understand the comparison with YUPs/KUPs or cheap Asia runs.

But that is not the point. It would appear that Qantas also thinks the el-cheapo Any Seat awards were a mistake and are under review and may end up disappearing.

If that is the case you will find a different way to earn status. You will evolve. If you really want to go somewhere then you may end spending the same amount of points on a Classic award. Isn't that what people were doing for many years until 2 years ago?

 

[Deleted User]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

Why does it matter what I think? Everyone thinks I am the villain here. Why?

I have an opinion that some here do not necessarily agree with. I do not like Any Seat awards earning SCs and QFF points. Never did. Right from the start. I do not understand the comparison with YUPs/KUPs or cheap Asia runs.

But that is not the point. It would appear that Qantas also thinks the el-cheapo Any Seat awards were a mistake and are under review and may end up disappearing.

If that is the case you will find a different way to earn status. You will evolve. If you really want to go somewhere then you may end spending the same amount of points on a Classic award. Isn't that what people were doing for many years until 2 years ago?

While it's available and still within he rules I don't see a problem... after all to gain status you need to actually fly, I'd imagine that from this Qantas make some revenue...?

Revenue = Happy Shareholders so it might not be that bad after all John

 

[sumthinfornuthin]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

While it's available and still within he rules I don't see a problem... after all to gain status you need to actually fly, I'd imagine that from this Qantas make some revenue...?

Revenue = Happy Shareholders so it might not be that bad after all John

I use them but I buy tickets too, to try and stay there as WP. my wife and I have just had 2 PAID tickets in Business from Melbourne to Singapore return.

Without status I would not be spending that sort of dollars.

qantas definitly sell these ASA tickets cheap but they keep the planes full and because they provide them I think lots of people like me spend their hard cash as well which otherwise might not have been spent

 

[JohnK]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

While it's available and still within he rules I don't see a problem... after all to gain status you need to actually fly, I'd imagine that from this Qantas make some revenue...?

We will just have to disagree on that one.

Qantas would not be making much money on some of these bookings. With the example I highlighted earlier the taxes & surcharge component on the Any Seat award are much less than a cheap red e-deal on that route. The points cost is minimal and you earn 4x the economy SCs and you also earn QFF points to offest the minimal cost in points for the Any Seat award.

Lets not compare them to Classic awards. Clearly earning 480 SCs (960 SCs with a double SCs offer) is worth a whole lot more than the $10-$15 surcharge some people think should be levied.

It is a good little loophole. Make the most of it while it is there. It is not the end of the world if these disappear. Is it?

 

[Deleted User]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

What confuses me though John is the Double Status Credit offers that get handed out... these are FREE SC's so isn't that a problem itself...?

 

[Princess Fiona]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

What confuses me though John is the Double Status Credit offers that get handed out... these are FREE SC's so isn't that a problem itself...?

I think you will find that JohnK is not a fan of DSC for the same reasons

 

[ketsuzei]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

I have an opinion that some here do not necessarily agree with.

And you express that opinion as though it's the only one that makes rational sense:

It makes no sense for the cheap Any Seat awards to continue regardless of what some on AFF may think.

I'm going to have to start barracking against 140k RTW awards as if they were Collingwood.

Beyond that, there's little point arguing with someone who takes 21,864 posts to express around four different views.

 

[Deleted User]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

I think you will find that JohnK is not a fan of DSC for the same reasons

Which go's against Qantas who love handing these offers out, hence perhaps Qantas show only modest value on SC's...?

 

[JohnK]

Re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April

What confuses me though John is the Double Status Credit offers that get handed out... these are FREE SC's so isn't that a problem itself...?

I think that lottery is wrong as well. Some people have it way too easy. Time and time again. Or should I feel happy for them for getting something for nothing?

I'm going to have to start barracking against 140k RTW awards as if they were Collingwood.

And you have every right. If they go they go. Move on.

Beyond that, there's little point arguing with someone who takes 21,864 posts to express around four different views.

Thanks for your wise summation....