Corporate travel policies

Thank you - total cost is a very good point, and we do tell people in the guiding principles of the policy to consider it, but I might make that a bit more specific.
The only issue we had with that, when working for some Aust Govt Clients, they would enforce a limit on how much we could spend per night on a hotel, which would be a stupidly cheap price, and not take into account those other costs. They were happy for us to stay within the hotel night limit, and spend another $100 per day on taxis getting to and from places where we could fit under the hotel cap. I ignored that, and used the total cost model for my teams, and presented the information in the 'correct' format for the client.
 
The only issue we had with that, when working for some Aust Govt Clients, they would enforce a limit on how much we could spend per night on a hotel, which would be a stupidly cheap price, and not take into account those other costs. They were happy for us to stay within the hotel night limit, and spend another $100 per day on taxis getting to and from places where we could fit under the hotel cap. I ignored that, and used the total cost model for my teams, and presented the information in the 'correct' format for the client.
Yes I’ve had exactly the same thing many many times with Aust Govt. The hotel daily rate cap was inflexible, and they literally did not care how much was spent on taxis to client and also on one occasion taxis to meals as the cheap hotel that was within the cap (in Darwin) did not offer meals and was not within safe night walking distance for single female travellers. After 3 trips to Darwin on that basis and questioning my taxi expense, they saw reason and opted for self catering apartment nearer to the client and a rental car instead of taxi. Much more sensible. But I don’t know why they couldn’t see that the first time I pointed it out to them, after the first trip.

So the message for travel policy is the clear need for common sense and an eye on total costs. Really the travel arrangers and travel approvers need to have had some poor travel experiences themselves before they start making decisions for others. When I ran my own company, I took my admin manager with me in a couple of trips just to show her what it was like to drive from CBR to western Sydney for an 0800 start with the client on a 2 day training program and why our policy, regardless of the client’s policy, was to drive up the night before. I also took her to Darwin, and made her go economy up so she could understand that too - gave her business on the way back. After these trips, she was a dedicated demon fighting for the rights of our travellers!
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Not saying it’s *all* corporates, or even all of the time. It just happened to be this particular itinerary.

‘minimising travel time’ may also lead to perverse results… it could be that an itinerary is 10 mins shorter, but costs $2000 more.

It’s just having someone… like yourself… look critically at a quote and cross-checking against googleflights or similar.

We had two pax travelling on the above mentioned itinerary, but different PNRs because one returned a day later. The agency had booked one passenger in eurobusiness for intra-europe travel, but the other in economy. It was the same fare, same times, same everything else. We pointed this out and the second pax was rebooked into business. However we then noticed an agency fee because we had ‘requested a change to the itinerary’.

Err no… this was an initial error that had to be fixed.

Gotta be on top of what’s quoted, and do a critical review.
Good points. I don't have time to do these reviews on an ongoing basis, but we can try to work out something where someone at least looks at a sample - and we can try to structure the business rules so that there's a balance between length and price!
Post automatically merged:

The only issue we had with that, when working for some Aust Govt Clients, they would enforce a limit on how much we could spend per night on a hotel, which would be a stupidly cheap price, and not take into account those other costs. They were happy for us to stay within the hotel night limit, and spend another $100 per day on taxis getting to and from places where we could fit under the hotel cap. I ignored that, and used the total cost model for my teams, and presented the information in the 'correct' format for the client.
Exactly the sort of perverse situation I'm trying to avoid! It wastes money, reduces staff engagement and is all-round mind-bogglingly stupid.
 
Yes I’ve had exactly the same thing many many times with Aust Govt. The hotel daily rate cap was inflexible, and they literally did not care how much was spent on taxis to client and also on one occasion taxis to meals as the cheap hotel that was within the cap (in Darwin) did not offer meals and was not within safe night walking distance for single female travellers. After 3 trips to Darwin on that basis and questioning my taxi expense, they saw reason and opted for self catering apartment nearer to the client and a rental car instead of taxi. Much more sensible. But I don’t know why they couldn’t see that the first time I pointed it out to them, after the first trip.

So the message for travel policy is the clear need for common sense and an eye on total costs. Really the travel arrangers and travel approvers need to have had some poor travel experiences themselves before they start making decisions for others. When I ran my own company, I took my admin manager with me in a couple of trips just to show her what it was like to drive from CBR to western Sydney for an 0800 start with the client on a 2 day training program and why our policy, regardless of the client’s policy, was to drive up the night before. I also took her to Darwin, and made her go economy up so she could understand that too - gave her business on the way back. After these trips, she was a dedicated demon fighting for the rights of our travellers!

Part of the problem, is letting other people organise travel for you. The best way is to book your own travel and just charge it to a company card.
 
Part of the problem, is letting other people organise travel for you. The best way is to book your own travel and just charge it to a company card.
After the various stuff ups endured when my travel was arranged by clients (compulsory, not optional) I totally 100% definitely agree with you!
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top