COVID-19 and Tennis

The case is adjourned until 3:15pm (AEDT)​

But before things wrapped up, Mr Tran outlined a couple of cases he'll be referring to during the proceedings.

"I think it will be useful for your honour to consider two cases. Both of them are going to be losses of mine, so I’ll be revisiting happy memories."
 
His lawyers office do state ‘experience to medical reasons’ or something apparently.
 
I assume you are referring to Vic covid rules/restrictions - wouldn't there be a usual exception for complying with court orders?
I think it's the offices of Hall & Wilcox own rules, regardless of the Victorian state rules.
His lawyers office do state ‘experience to medical reasons’ or something apparently.
Yes so not ironically, he'll need to explain what his exemption is to them also - otherwise their not exactly proving their own case.
 
Yes so not ironically, he'll need to explain what his exemption is to them also - otherwise their not exactly proving their own case.

Probably look the other way if given enough financial incentive.

Also how they define "Accepted medical Exemption"? Accepted by who? Their own discretion, the Feds, Vic Gov?
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Muse.

"...
The stream later appeared to have been taken over and was displaying coughographic content.

Once hearings got underway, the stream was plagued by dropouts for more than an hour as demand for the link swelled, with the judge reminding those who are tuning in that they must mute their microphones was imperative.

It led to a number of illegal bootleg streams of the hearing, with more than 20,000 people watching the courtroom drama playout via a tennis podcast’s YouTube channel, despite the court reminding members of the public on several occasions that any recording, photography, or broadcasting is “not permitted”.
"

https://www.couriermail.com.au/spor...s/news-story/cce4ece13350aedb98b7c3631104c3e5
 
Muse.

"...
The stream later appeared to have been taken over and was displaying coughographic content.

Once hearings got underway, the stream was plagued by dropouts for more than an hour as demand for the link swelled, with the judge reminding those who are tuning in that they must mute their microphones was imperative.

It led to a number of illegal bootleg streams of the hearing, with more than 20,000 people watching the courtroom drama playout via a tennis podcast’s YouTube channel, despite the court reminding members of the public on several occasions that any recording, photography, or broadcasting is “not permitted”.
"

https://www.couriermail.com.au/spor...s/news-story/cce4ece13350aedb98b7c3631104c3e5

Very fitting for the whle debacle :rolleyes:
 
This is going to go late or arguments will push into tomorrow. I’d imagine Tran would like 2-3 hours to discuss his arguments.
 
This is going to go late or arguments will push into tomorrow. I’d imagine Tran would like 2-3 hours to discuss his arguments.
You need to watch the stream right now (1714 AEDT).

The decision to cancel visa is being quashed.
 
Interesting know nothing about courts does Tran not get a chance to put his arguments forward?
 
And the taxpayers will wear the costs of course
Post automatically merged:

Counsel for Home Affairs says he has instruction from Min for Immigration that he may exercise right to cancel visa on other grounds.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top