AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Rep,
Shout us to a lunch at Rockpool and all will be forgiven
Rep,
Shout us to a lunch at Rockpool and all will be forgiven
Even Glass would do
I cannot believe the number of people who were not aware of the situation with connecting flights instead of direct flights. Qantas do this, and it is standard practice to price a connecting fare at more than a direct fare. The only real exceptions are when there aren't direct flights or I guess in certain circumstances. An example that jumps to mind with QF is BNE-ADL. The connecting flights used to cost the same as direct, I guess because of the limited direct options. That changed a few years ago, with the fare rules for connections no longer being allowed at the same price as direct flights.
I am also amazed at some of the suggestions here that, for example, MEL-CBR-SYD should be the same price as MEL-SYD. We all want something for nothing, well sorry but welcome to the big bad world.
@VelocityFrequentFlyer: Spent half an hour in the Gold Coast lounge two weeks ago and was very happy with the service, the staff, food, drink and layout.
Well worth the use of one of my two Silver level passes. Lounge access is now a good reason for me to try to move enough travel across to VA to get Gold. But that trip SYD-OOL-SYD has yet to post to Velocity Rewards. Is there a reason why VA flights don't show up in Velocity for 14 days? It's one of the annoying things about the VA/Velocity Rewards split sites. Is there a plan to have prompter points/status posting?
I believe the issue arose in post #54 by VFF where it was implied that a connecting flight being double the cost of a direct flight was 'pretty standard practice' (rather than merely being 'more').
Whilst I recognise it costs more to deploy 2 flights A-B-C over one A-C, I'm still not keen on it being seen as 'standard' that for example MEL-SYD-BNE alternative will cost me double MEL-BNE.
Compare it to other airlines then. It's pretty close to how Qantas would price it these days...
I've found my post-Sabre bookings to have credited promptly but pre-Sabre bookings still dragging the chain when it comes to posting.Interesting. My points have been posting within 24-48 hours lately, even over this Easter period. The last 8 flights in the past four weeks have all posted that quickly.
Answering your questions:
Hi Doc, yes there is a plan to allow seat selection online between booking and check in. Sabre wasn’t able to support this functionality at cutover, however we are working with the Sabre team on a solution. We know that the current setup isn't perfect, but know that we are working towards giving as much flexibility as possible to our members to choose their favourite seat!
I believe the issue arose in post #54 by VFF where it was implied that a connecting flight being double the cost of a direct flight was 'pretty standard practice' (rather than merely being 'more').
Whilst I recognise it costs more to deploy 2 flights A-B-C over one A-C, I'm still not keen on it being seen as 'standard' that for example MEL-SYD-BNE alternative will cost me double MEL-BNE.
I've found my post-Sabre bookings to have credited promptly but pre-Sabre bookings still dragging the chain when it comes to posting.
Answering your questions:
1. Where we had “journey” fares before, we have now implemented pricing based on sum of sectors especially where a direct flight also operates. With your particular example, we simply want to encourage people to fly direct MEL-OOL rather than connect hence the cheaper fare on the direct flight. This is a pretty standard industry practice.
Just had a look. For QF MEL/BNE 17 April 7am departure :
Red edeal : Flexi Saver : Fully Flexible : Business
171 : 340 : 771 : 1000
for MEL/SYD/BNE
434 : 552 : 1089 : 1329
At other times there are no equivalent departure times. The difference is more than I thought for the economy fares, but for J about what I've noticed previously. But as we know, prices swing throughout the day and the gap probably will open out depending on demand.
Let's take MEL-CNS. I believe there is usually only 1 direct flight per day. I've flown both direct and MEL-BNE-CNS on VA pre-Sabre before. From memory the via Brisbane was only slightly more than the cost of the direct (25% or so), not double.
Just looking at a random date (6 months out) for this route on the QF website, yes their direct flight is the cheapest. But their flights connecting through SYD and BNE are only slightly more expensive in all classes (20% more, not 100%).
Sorry, MEL-OOL was probably a bad example.
Let's take MEL-CNS. I believe there is usually only 1 direct flight per day. I've flown both direct and MEL-BNE-CNS on VA pre-Sabre before. From memory the via Brisbane was only slightly more than the cost of the direct (25% or so), not double.
Just looking at a random date (6 months out) for this route on the QF website, yes their direct flight is the cheapest. But their flights connecting through SYD and BNE are only slightly more expensive in all classes (20% more, not 100%).
I fully understand you wanting pax to take the direct route where possible (MEL-ADL via SYD is just ridiculous) but Im more interested in those route where there is only 1 direct flight per day and the connecting flights simply stop off somewhere logically on the way. Of course pax should be charged more where they connect rather than go direct as there are obviously higher costs for you, my question is whether charging them double is the correct amount as surely no-one would ever pay double and hence my original question why sell them if no-one is going to buy them. I would have thought 25 - 50% would be far more reasonable than 100%.