Delta Flight Crashes In Toronto: Plane Lands Upside Down, Wings Torn Away

I'm no expert, but it looks to have hit the runway rather hard and without flaring?
That seems to be the way that the pilot members of pprune are tending too. Very hard, with some bank, puts the load on to one oleo. If that failed, and broke the spar, then nothing would stop the other wing just rolling the aircraft over.
 
If you don't want to sit through the ads first

That's a new one (also in the Oz on-line this morning) and is taken from the coughpit of another plane on the tarmac (circumstance unspecified). @jb747 , apart from the value of the film in the investigation, is there a circumstance where filming from the coughpit of a plane somewhere on the field would be allowed (or appropriate, if you like)? I wonder if the Delta had radioed some sort of problem on descent so the other crew picked up their phone?
 
That's a new one (also in the Oz on-line this morning) and is taken from the coughpit of another plane on the tarmac (circumstance unspecified). @jb747 , apart from the value of the film in the investigation, is there a circumstance where filming from the coughpit of a plane somewhere on the field would be allowed (or appropriate, if you like)?
Well, I used to run a camera reasonably regularly, though mine was more a case of setting it up, and then forgetting about it. I’m not convinced that adding to the list of what you aren’t allowed to do makes the operation any safer, though it does give management another chance to deflect blame.
I wonder if the Delta had radioed some sort of problem on descent so the other crew picked up their phone?
I doubt it. As best I can tell they simply got it wrong.
 
That seems to be the way that the pilot members of pprune are tending too. Very hard, with some bank, puts the load on to one oleo. If that failed, and broke the spar, then nothing would stop the other wing just rolling the aircraft over.
Considering the most recent footage that's come to light along with your observation quoted above, is there any chance that instrumentation in the coughpit could have been providing erroneous data given the conditions? This may simply end up being an open and shut case of human error, but I'm curious as to what part the weather and snow/ice on the runway could have played in the incident?
 
What it looked like, trying to get out


View attachment 432181
I appreciate that photos/footage from inside can be useful for investigations and/or training and learning, but it never ceases to amaze me how people think they have the time - let alone think that it's appropriate - to whip out a phone and snap a pic or shoot some video in the midst of an emergency evacuation scenario.
 
Australia's highest-earning Velocity Frequent Flyer credit card: Offer expires: 30 Apr 2025
- Earn 100,000 bonus Velocity Points
- Get unlimited Virgin Australia Lounge access
- Enjoy a complimentary return Virgin Australia domestic flight each year

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Considering the most recent footage that's come to light along with your observation quoted above, is there any chance that instrumentation in the coughpit could have been providing erroneous data given the conditions?
None really. They would have been completely visual at that point, and the only thing they'd be looking at inside would be the ASI. Literally saying over and over...airspeed, line up, aim point, power.
This may simply end up being an open and shut case of human error, but I'm curious as to what part the weather and snow/ice on the runway could have played in the incident?
Depending on just what the vis was like (and it doesn't look bad), there can be a tendency to aim short when you can't see far enough down the runway.
 
Last edited:
This is why I am absolutely certain that JAL516 'escaped' without any fatalities purely because it happened in Japan and not one person would have been selfish enough to grab their carry on.
Had it happened in the US, or here, it would have been different.
(I have no evidence for this POV, it's just the vibe)
 
This is why I am absolutely certain that JAL516 'escaped' without any fatalities purely because it happened in Japan and not one person would have been selfish enough to grab their carry on.
Had it happened in the US, or here, it would have been different.
(I have no evidence for this POV, it's just the vibe)

The number of people in comment sections defending those taking carry on bags and saying they would do the same does my head in
 
Well they are from Minnesota.

Was good watching the videos on our big screen. Just before touchdown the plane was lower on the right side. Immediately after touchdown the right wing hit the ground and was smashed along with a fuel tank and the right rear wheel. Caused the plane to flip.

Seems like that may have saved lives as the flames were extinguished. Though still dense black smoke. If they hadn’t flipped maybe the fire would have been worse and spread to the cabin particularly the rear.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top