jb747
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Posts
- 13,092
Why? What do you mean?Hat's off for the crew and passengers.
Why? What do you mean?Hat's off for the crew and passengers.
There’s another photo showing it upside down?DL and snow is not a good combination.
View attachment 432100
Seriously though, I’m glad I can joke about it and that the outcome wasn’t more tragic. I hope those injured pull through swiftly.
Hat’s off?Hat's off for the crew and passengers.
That seems to be the way that the pilot members of pprune are tending too. Very hard, with some bank, puts the load on to one oleo. If that failed, and broke the spar, then nothing would stop the other wing just rolling the aircraft over.I'm no expert, but it looks to have hit the runway rather hard and without flaring?
The image in the quoted post is of N909DL, an MD88 which veered off the runway at LGA while landing as DL1086 in March 2015.There’s another photo showing it upside down
Thanks for clearing that up.The image in the quoted post is of N909DL, an MD88 which veered off the runway at LGA while landing as DL1086 in March 2015.
The incident this morning was N932XJ, a CR9.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
If you don't want to sit through the ads firstThere's footage of the landing in this article https://www.news.com.au/travel/trav...t/news-story/0f415aa1fbc2c9e18ebc33d37a92b0b3
I'm no expert, but it looks to have hit the runway rather hard and without flaring?
If you don't want to sit through the ads first
Well, I used to run a camera reasonably regularly, though mine was more a case of setting it up, and then forgetting about it. I’m not convinced that adding to the list of what you aren’t allowed to do makes the operation any safer, though it does give management another chance to deflect blame.That's a new one (also in the Oz on-line this morning) and is taken from the coughpit of another plane on the tarmac (circumstance unspecified). @jb747 , apart from the value of the film in the investigation, is there a circumstance where filming from the coughpit of a plane somewhere on the field would be allowed (or appropriate, if you like)?
I doubt it. As best I can tell they simply got it wrong.I wonder if the Delta had radioed some sort of problem on descent so the other crew picked up their phone?
Considering the most recent footage that's come to light along with your observation quoted above, is there any chance that instrumentation in the coughpit could have been providing erroneous data given the conditions? This may simply end up being an open and shut case of human error, but I'm curious as to what part the weather and snow/ice on the runway could have played in the incident?That seems to be the way that the pilot members of pprune are tending too. Very hard, with some bank, puts the load on to one oleo. If that failed, and broke the spar, then nothing would stop the other wing just rolling the aircraft over.
I appreciate that photos/footage from inside can be useful for investigations and/or training and learning, but it never ceases to amaze me how people think they have the time - let alone think that it's appropriate - to whip out a phone and snap a pic or shoot some video in the midst of an emergency evacuation scenario.What it looked like, trying to get out
![]()
5.1M views · 28K reactions | Passengers Rush to Escape Delta Crash Passenger Pete Koukov shared a video capturing the chaotic moments inside Delta Flight 4819 after it crash-landed... | By A Fly Guy's Cabin Crew Lounge | Facebook
Passengers Rush to Escape Delta Crash Passenger Pete Koukov shared a video capturing the chaotic moments inside Delta Flight 4819 after it crash-landed...www.facebook.com
View attachment 432181
I remember thinking RIGHT before landing that we seemed to be getting tossed around by the wind a lot. We touched down, then seemed to go airborne again.
None really. They would have been completely visual at that point, and the only thing they'd be looking at inside would be the ASI. Literally saying over and over...airspeed, line up, aim point, power.Considering the most recent footage that's come to light along with your observation quoted above, is there any chance that instrumentation in the coughpit could have been providing erroneous data given the conditions?
Depending on just what the vis was like (and it doesn't look bad), there can be a tendency to aim short when you can't see far enough down the runway.This may simply end up being an open and shut case of human error, but I'm curious as to what part the weather and snow/ice on the runway could have played in the incident?
This is why I am absolutely certain that JAL516 'escaped' without any fatalities purely because it happened in Japan and not one person would have been selfish enough to grab their carry on.
Had it happened in the US, or here, it would have been different.
(I have no evidence for this POV, it's just the vibe)