one9 - my experience is that it happens to all airlines whether LCC or "full service". As I mentioned in my post above, it has happened to me on AA and my boss had a particularly bad experience with SQ. No airline is immune from stuff ups when equipment or systems fail.one9 said:this post describes a flight booked with australian airlines, which is also a discount air carrier.
in general you get what you pay for.
you can not expect to have the same level of service and the same amount of staff assisting when a problem arises with a budget airline compared with a non budget airline.
I agree. Even DJ now classify themselves as a "new world carrier".blundeni said:Also I really dont think that Virgin or PB really fit the LCC model - our tickets were only about $200 cheaper that the equivalent QF flight - the reason we took PB was the better flight times allowing us more time in Fiji.
Australian Airlines were adamant that they were not a discount carrier. They claim they were an all-economy full service airline.one9 said:this post describes a flight booked with australian airlines, which is also a discount air carrier.
in general you get what you pay for.
you can not expect to have the same level of service and the same amount of staff assisting when a problem arises with a budget airline compared with a non budget airline.
Virgin and Pacific Blue were seperate companies
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Dave, one QF story does not make Virgin Blue/Pacific Blue look better. Your response on this thread should have been to explain why the OP had these problems and what Virgin Blue/Pacific Blue would do in future to rectify their very poor customer care.crazydave98 said:This from today's paper...
mileagemax said:Feel for you, but here is my 2 cents anyway:
1. Short complaint letters work alot better... most employees won't read it all and just skim over it.
jad01 said:Their customer service is disgraceful.
I think their recruitment is way too focused on pretty looks and the song and dance carrying on like a ****head elements.
Everytime I have experienced a problem with Virgin Blue it's met by what sounds like a scripted response repeated over and over that doesnt actually answer the dilemma at the time.
I would rather a 48 year old woman who knows how to assess and deal with problems than some 22 year old blonde who fixes her hair about 30 times while she rattles of "I dont understand".
It really makes me worry that despite their training in a controlled environment, how they would actually deal with a real emergency if they cant even deal with stuff ups they they created.
While I agree that it would have been better to inform passengers and be better prepared for such weather problems, as the post from crazydave98 shows this applies to every airline. With air travel, cough happens sometimes.jad01 said:In regard to the initial thread, if the initial flight was cancelled the flight passengers were put on was late departing.....staff should have foreseen possible congestion and problems at the other end.......and with around 4hrs in the air, they would have had plenty of time to organise a contingency plan.
About the fog delays - isn't it about time we had decent equipment at airports? I'm sick of below-third-world-country standards of instrument approaches in Australia
Commuter said:About the fog delays - isn't it about time we had decent equipment at airports? I'm sick of below-third-world-country standards of instrument approaches in Australia
That might be the case in Australia, I don't know.one9 said:I thought it was against the law for a commercial plane to land if there is less than X metres of visibility.
one9 said:I thought it was against the law for a commercial plane to land if there is less than X metres of visibility.