Take out the deaths caused by the cruise industry - QLD would probably be the same or lower.
Looking at the numbers - NZ has gone the full monty, for bugger all, or zero benefit.
My point was more on the stats.
However I do believe, and perhaps agree with you(?), that the Australian approach to date after a few initial stumbles has been an excellent one and a very good balance of both the health and economic threats.
I do disagree strongly with your point to the other night that we should now deliberately start exposing people to CV 19.
Social (Physical) Distancing, Quarantining, Handwashing etc have all combined to achieve a result way better that any in government, or their health advisers, would have hoped for. Australians in the main have been so good at embracing social distancing and doing it in the spirit of Stay at Home, rather than seeking to exploit loopholes, that we are probably achieving almost the same result despite the in theory more harsh NZ restrictions.
It now sets up us to go the eradication path that New Zealand is striving to achieve, but with a lot less economic pain.
Our new daily cases today was only 85. The first sub-100 day since March 17. With our current trend in this I would currently see no reason why within Australia that by the end of April that our new cases will be so low (ignoring any new arrivals who go into quarantine) that we cannot start to re-activate our close businesses in a stage manner. thing back on at once .ie Do not turn every Keeping appropriate health measure though, and still encouraging work at home practices.
Many leisure pastimes will also again become possible. But again stage their re-introduction.
Leisure international travel to remain no no till a vaccine is developed. And most if not all business travel too. I personally would not be willing to sacrifice the lives and permanent lung damage that re-introducing international travel would result in if done pre-vaccine.
There may be some rare exemptions on compassionate grounds, but quarantine on return.