My bolding:
How many times do I have to tell you.the Age article is about 1 outbreak in Provincetown,mass.it is basically an outlier in the USA delta outbreaks.And one outbreak doesn't mean every other outbreak will give the same result.Yiu have absolutely no understanding of Medical trials,significance and relevance.
The Age report of one trial is not the absolute truth.Stop trying to give the absolute worst spin on everything.This is not like Finance and maths where things can be black and white.
The Age article referred to a CDC document mentioning more than '1 outbreak'. Those documents were posted by the NY Times who got them. You may have missed this in The Age article - "
The agency’s document relies on data from multiple studies". Not 1 outbreak, I had a look.
The US CDC thought highly enough to REVERSE their previous recommendations for fully vaccinated people.
True, it may not be like 'Finance and maths' but the peak medical body for disease control in the US thinks highly enough of it - they made the call, not me.
I pass on the details as accurately as possible and attempt not to twist. That does not qualify as 'absolute worst spin' but transparency. It may not suit a narrative but that is besides the point.
If someone identifies a mistake - I am happy to acknowledge & correct. Such as wrongly naming RPA, instead of Liverpool, hospital.
The
study you quoted at length was irrelevant, it
covered the period pre-Delta with less than 0.04% of the cases involving the Delta variant, wasn't it?
Anyone can make mistakes, but it seems few (like Scott Morrison) admit it.
Currently in Australia with so few fully vaccinated the risk flowing from a breakthrough case infecting someone not vaccinated or immunocompromised is much higher than when we are at or above say 80% of the entire population (not just adult population).
Disability Care facility residents yet to receive their first dose is still above 33% as of last Friday.
People need to take precautions.