JohnK
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2005
- Posts
- 44,066
The 2 terms seemed to be used together when I was checking Google earlier.Is that what used to be called 'fluid on the knee'?
The 2 terms seemed to be used together when I was checking Google earlier.Is that what used to be called 'fluid on the knee'?
Is that what used to be called 'fluid on the knee'?
Picture is worth a thousand words essentially.The Surgeon looked at the Knee Film for 2 seconds and didn't look at the report from the imaging place.
Just weird as it was an X ray he had previously seen and I thought he could have taken some easy notes he could have taken from the first visit. Anyway on a good note, he said her lumbar spine was very good for her age.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Oh. I’m Sorry to hear that. He certainly looked so well in the pictures you showed me.It's been a good news/bad news day.
Good news - Friend with pulmonary fibrosis had a very positve/hopeful diagnosis from the respiratory surgeon. Some more tests but seems it is not aggressive and she is likely to have many more years before it makes life difficult.
Bad news - friend with stage 4 bowel cancer scans have shown a new very large tumour in liver as well as smaller ones elsewhere. Is back in hospital while they decide how to treat it, though it's inoperable. They are trying to keep positve but must be worried. We saw him about a month ago and he was feeling great. They had planned two trips o's in the next few months.
Before they removed part of my mother's bowel, they did multiple images and even with the lower GI scope, it took them a while to work out their were two tumours.For the ultrasound I had multiple specialists reading it as they couldn’t quite believe what they were seeing. Eventually the radiographers at the RAH made the diagnosis rather than the radiographer who took the films as he kept changing his mind. The haemotologist also wanted to examine them and agreed with the RAH people. A picture as they say.
Physios and Chiros are very different.
A Chiro is focused on a realignment or adjustment of joints.
Physio looks at muscular and joint pain but works on release and mobilising - the massage, stretches, heat, US etc but particularly exercises to build strength and prevent reoccurrence. They're also more inclined to look at the bigger picture and treat the cause not just the symptoms. I see mine to treat knee pain initially so I use it properly and then move to the actual cause which is in my glutes.
Lucky getting the bulk billing - must have had acute trauma, non extension and diagnosis of ??acute tear. That's the only way you get them for knees!
It's great that it helps you but I will never be able to reproduce what happens in a physio session. The exercises are not that simple and can leave, and have left, damage for days.Hence why they hassle you about doing the exercises!
I saw that at the GP the other day. I'm not sure what it covers but suffering from diabetes and chronic health issues qualifies me for the benefit but is it one only or yearly? I had the care plan once around 12 years ago. Not sure if still eligible.Don't forget too if you have a chronic health issue then you can get a care plan with 5 visits covered ($55 each roughly) by Medicare too.
Just curious - is anybody stocking up with a few extra packets of Panadiene/Prodiene/Mersyndol etc before codiene becomes a prescription item next year?