I had a re-think about the MASA score tonight.
My revised MASA score would take into account both PPS (points per SC) and $PS ($ per SC) with the formula being the
product of PPS and $PS.
The rationale is that we all aim for the lowest PPS and the lowest $PS, therefore the lowest product would represent the best "yield" or "bang for your points".
See the following table for real bookings I had made in the last 3 weeks:
[TABLE="width: 290"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: grid, width: 500, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD]Route[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]PPS (points per SC)[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]240[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]300[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]290[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]$PS ($ per SC)[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1.45[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1.6[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2.03[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]MASA score[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]348[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]480[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]591[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
I had just cancelled route #2 and will cancel route #3 next week as route 1 gives me the best yield.
The quest continues .... until MASA dies.
PS: subject to further revisions