thadocta said:Can't see NLK in that list, which would be an extra one for me to have been to... Also MAN when QF flew there, also have been into FCO and AMS on QF, do they count?
Dave
DPG said:thadocta said:Can't see NLK in that list, which would be an extra one for me to have been to... Also MAN when QF flew there, also have been into FCO and AMS on QF, do they count?
Dave
QF don't fly to NLK...? (do they)
QF 393 0 01MAR06 BNE 0730 NLK 1105 734 Y9 B9 H9 K9 M9 R0 L9 V9 S9 N9 Q9 O9 G0 T0 X0 E0
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
thadocta said:DPG said:thadocta said:Yes, they do.
QF 393 0 01MAR06 BNE 0730 NLK 1105 734 Y9 B9 H9 K9 M9 R0 L9 V9 S9 N9 Q9 O9 G0 T0 X0 E0
Sure, it is a code-share, but QF (and NZ) were the only carriers with traffic rights on this sector, and since ON (Air Nauru) do not offer this flight under their own code - namely ALL seats have to be sold under the QF flight number - then I am counting it as a QF flight. Particularly since QF operate all of the Air Nauru flights anyway (since ON had their aircraft repossessed).
Dave
Dave I will pay that... A great response... While technically a codeshare (flight number in the 300's) as there is no other airline operating the flight why not!
As mentioned earlier, I as listing flights from the QF website's route map that show as being QF flights...
D P G
But can we inlcude QF destinations to which we flew on non-QF airlines? For example, the only time I have been through Darwin was on a BOAC VC-10 (now I am showing my age).DPG said:As mentioned earlier, I as listing flights from the QF website's route map that show as being QF flights...
And those airports identified as in-flight alternates ....Kiwi Flyer said:How about including all destinations ever served by QF, all destinations ever served of previous airlines taken over, all destinations ever served by local defunct competitors, all destinations ever served by partner and alliance airlines (including previous airlines they have taken over, all their local defunct competitors and all their partners)?
If you then throw in airports not served by overflown (within a few hundred miles) I think you should get most places covered.