Hi all,
Many thanks for so many comments in less than 24 hours.
I posted here because I liked the definition of this forum "This is where you can ask the hard questions about frequent flyer programs .. ", and I'm really pleased my question has generated a lot of interesting perspectives.
I agree with the comment that for some companies, the ownership of miles is irrelevant, as they could/would negotiate lower fares that don't include the benefit of the FF miles. However, I think this is an option for the largest of companies only, who have the buying power, but less so in medium sized companies, or smaller.
Having said that, it's clear that not all large companies that choose to own the FF miles do this. Some certainly attempt to manage the FF miles internally, using Excel or whatever. There were also a number of comments about government use of the FF miles that clearly stated they try to manage them internally, but probably not very well .. the point being, they didn't go back to the airline for lower prices, without FF miles. Why? Who knows?
Believe me, I fully understand the emotions related to getting FF miles, and how it can keep the peace at home. I've also done my fair share of circling the globe over the years. If I had to write a book, it would be called "Delayed" !
But, again consistent with this topic's definition about asking hard questions, isn't there a difference between employee rights and employee benefits? I never had the right to fly business class, and when my company changed the policy to save money that forced us to fly economy for trans-atlantic flights, everyone was up in arms for a while, .... but no-one left. When they downgraded the car policy, we all cried, .... but nobody left. Why? Because companies do this when times are tough, which usually means it's a last resort, and certainly preferable to layoffs. And because of tough times, it's not that employees have so many options for other vacancies, by definition. Of course, there are always exceptions ... but I'm talking generally. I suppose, after years of flying business class, we (ie where I worked) thought it was our right, but it never was. It was a privilege, a perk .. consistent with the comment in this forum that FF miles are now being offered as a perk in some job postings. In the USA, Southwestern is the cheapest airline .. very, very basic .. soon they'll also charge for a visit to the toilet, or to breath … but many companies force employees now to fly SW because the savings are huge.
As for if there's a trend for companies to own the miles instead of employees, ie my original posted question, well, it seem there's certainly some noise in that area, backed up by the comment that companies are posting FF miles as a perk.
Is it illegal? Well, I'm no lawyer, but it doesn't seem so, as it's clear in the USA some companies already own the miles, in order to reduce travel costs. How do I know about the USA? I approached the top 100 of the Fortune 500 and asked.
As for the comment in this forum in Germany, interesting.
Yes, as per a couple of the comments, I made a humble mistake a week ago with a posting here, because I didn't realize about the rules for posting, and my post was rapidly deleted. My fault. So, to keep this discussion objective, I've removed reference to my website, etc, from my profile here, so in case anyone wanted to talk to me privately, it seems they can't! But still, it's an interesting discussion.
No, I'm not American and not sitting in the USA! Correct, my reference to "coach" is what we all know as "economy class" ..
And as for the early comment about taking them from cold dead hands, I hope with the controversy I introduced here, they won't be my hands ;-)
Stuart