The JQ787-800 has 3 bassinets at row 23
Apparently 7 babies travelled on JQ27 when it diverted due to drunken behaviour of the Jetstar5
That means remaining 4 would either have been lap-babies, or their parents purchased a seat for them - not.
7 babies, Jetstar5 involved in a flight, a divert...., arrival time delayed by 3 hours.
JQ does not store baby formula or nappies and parents have to carry these within their carry on luggage allowance - therefore limited in what they can carry.
Extend the flight by a few hours and the formula/nappies would have run out.
Me thinks there would be a few screamers on that flight. Maybe one reason the Jetstar5 went beserk!!!!! Definitely would be screaming at the other end.
Would the Jetstar5 be able to claim anything from their travel insurance (if any) for their missed holiday?