Jobkeeper/Jobseeker and Other Government COVID-19 Responses

Does anyone know how JobKeeper interact with CoINVEST (portable long service leave in VIC)?

If an employee goes on LSL and gets paid by CoINVEST and not by the employer, does that mean it fails the wage payment criteria of JobKeeper?
Interesting Question!


I'd suggest anyone so affected would need to speak to a specialist in the subject - perhaps CoINVEST has some specific advice.
 
For those that use Xero, they have now added the JobKeeper Payment top up

The instructions seem easy to follow.

TIP: If you want to pay the SGC on the $1500 you have to add a second SGC line. On the Payslip it will still just show the one SGC line, plus the normal Salary Sacrifice line if you also pay that.


In my case I also opted to just delete the April pay run that I had done and redo. The delete process lodges a report to the ATO for STP.
Due to the Salary Sacrifice being calculated as a % and the second SGC as a fixed amount it meant that the final pay was fractionally different in Net pay.
 
Last edited:
For those that use Xero, they have now added the JobKeeper Payment top up

The instructions seem easy to follow.

TIP: If you want to pay the SGC on the $1500 you have to add a second SGC line. On the Payslip in will still just show the one SGC line, plus the normal Salary Sacrifice line if you also pay that.


In my case I also opted to just delete the April pay run that I had done and redo. The delete process lodges a report to the ATO for STP.
Due to the Salary Sacrifice being calculated as a % and the second SGC as a fixed amount it meant that the final pay was fractionally different in Net pay.
Seems like each software is doing it differently. We are also paying regular salary even though hours worked is well under. The only difference in our MYOB payroll is entering the line JOBKEEPER...... and an entry of .01 cents (so it gets entered as an actual transaction, which it won't if left as .00 cents), enter the salary as normal (and any SS) and the super is calculated as normal, then adding .01 to tax deducted so that the pay amount remains the same. At least I think that's right?

Like you I simply deleted the pay and re-entered because of course, one pay was made on 30 March. And we haven't finalised the BAS3 yet as the ATO will be paying us everything back with their initial Stimulus package (repayment of PAYG).
 
... And we haven't finalised the BAS3 yet as the ATO will be paying us everything back with their initial Stimulus package (repayment of PAYG).

The the ATO BP was showing the 3rd Quarter BAS as being due 26th May. We normally do make use of the two week extension offerred for online submissions which would have been May 12th.

I'm guessing the 4week extension is another of the COVID-19 government initiatives.

We submitted the "BAS3" on Friday and the payment due date is May 26th.
 
The the ATO BP was showing the 3rd Quarter BAS as being due 26th May. We normally do make use of the two week extension offerred for online submissions which would have been May 12th.

I'm guessing the 4week extension is another of the COVID-19 government initiatives.

We submitted the "BAS3" on Friday and the payment due date is May 26th.
That date shift hasn't been mentioned in the media I dont think, but that date is the same as ours. Gives the ATO to implement the "refund" of the PAYG payments that were part of the first Covid package.
 
That date shift hasn't been mentioned in the media I dont think, but that date is the same as ours. Gives the ATO to implement the "refund" of the PAYG payments that were part of the first Covid package.
I first noticed the 26th May date a month ago and it was available for both of the two entities we deal with.

So it's been around from approx. the time the "refund" (AKA "Boosting cash flow for employers") scheme.

There is also a lot here that I was not aware of:

 
Last edited:
I first noticed the 26th May date a month ago and it was available for their of the two entities we deal with.

So it's been around from the time the "refund" AKA "Boosting cash flow for employers" scheme.

There a lot here that I was not aware of:

Ah. That explains why I didn't need to adjust expected Profit for this financial year. It automatically zeroed out. Thanks!
 
In my emails overnight

There was also info on Casuals and Jobkeeper but dont know if thats an interest to share here, let me know


1587424692666.png

1587424751757.png

1587424817316.png
1587424841074.png
 
In my emails overnight

There was also info on Casuals and Jobkeeper but dont know if thats an interest to share here, let me know


View attachment 215560

View attachment 215561

View attachment 215562
View attachment 215563
Thankyou. This is in line with what MYOB are saying. We pay more so no need to change much other than notify of the start date. I contacted the accountant yesterday and he was saying we needed pay the $1500 as one entry then anything additional is to be entered in payroll as a top up. Emailed him back and suggested that top up code is only used when topping UP to $1500 and not when paying over $1500 gross. He said ok stick with MYOB suggestion (he has online access to our file) but that he uses xero and that’s what they were saying. I don’t think so...
 
but that he uses xero and that’s what they were saying. I don’t think so...

In Xero the Jobkeeper topup is separate line and is only for that. Your other pay (if any) is as per usual (ie less the Jobkeeper amount).
 
Last edited:
In Xero the Jobkeeper topup is separate line and is only for that. Your other pay (if any) is as per usual (ie less the Jobkeeper amount).
I thought exactly the same thing. I think my accountant got caught a bit short. A tad worrying. Given he said he's been busy advising others how to apply For it but I'd already got things sorted.
 
I thought exactly the same thing. I think my accountant got caught a bit short. A tad worrying. Given he said he's been busy advising others how to apply For it but I'd already got things sorted.

Your accountant is not correct. Process pay as usual and only top up as required to get to the $1,500. Hope it helps.
 
Your accountant is not correct. Process pay as usual and only top up as required to get to the $1,500. Hope it helps.
Yep. Thankyou for confirming. It's good to have another confirmation. In another life I'd get a new accountant. Heaven help those he is setting this up for!
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Thanks everyone for your posts. I'm sitting here setting up these jobkeeper pay codes and allowance codes in our payroll system which is Pronto Xi.
Seems all the same as everyone else. We too are paying everyone over the $1500 a fortnight (with some on paid leave) and so no topup to worry about, just the start codes as far as I can tell.
we havent done the actual application yet but think we will qualify for the month of April vs April 2019 so are just waiting until closer to the end of the month to be sure and then will apply.
Only thing I'm a bit unsure about is that pays are already done for most of April, next fortnight pay I can do a day early on April 30 and include the start pay code from March 30, will that work?
 
Also with regards to directors vs employees. My understanding is that any/all directors that are paid via wages with PAYGW ie are employees can qualify for jobkeeper if they are eligible/company is eligible. So for our small busines that is me and my husband who are directors that are employees as well as all the rest of our eligible employees.
 
Also with regards to directors vs employees. My understanding is that any/all directors that are paid via wages with PAYGW ie are employees can qualify for jobkeeper if they are eligible/company is eligible. So for our small busines that is me and my husband who are directors that are employees as well as all the rest of our eligible employees.
As long as you both are being employed (ie Payment summaries at eofy; have tax taken out and sent to ATO monthly through STP etc) then you can both qualify for JobKeeper.
 
Also with regards to directors vs employees. My understanding is that any/all directors that are paid via wages with PAYGW ie are employees can qualify for jobkeeper if they are eligible/company is eligible. So for our small busines that is me and my husband who are directors that are employees as well as all the rest of our eligible employees.

That sounds right although the rules seem muddier than that ...


So if there’s been a history of regular PAYG-W for the person as an employee which the ATO would have IN The STP records, then sounds good to go
If there’s no history of regular (Eg fortnightly, monthly) PAYG-W for directors or partners then only one will be eligible.
Post automatically merged:

There’s also been latitude given to tax agents

 
Yes to salary, STP, PAYGW and EOFY payment summaries for both directors so good to go I think! Thanks.
 
Yes to salary, STP, PAYGW and EOFY payment summaries for both directors so good to go I think! Thanks.

I have a friend running a cafe via a corporate trustee who doesn’t do this so there’s no JobKeeper for him and casuals were <12 months . in the end, it’s JobSeeker & access to super (being 3 years from preservation age)
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Recent Posts

Back
Top