ols
Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2018
- Posts
- 367
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Sapphire
And Molly MeldrumPeeing on the floor should , perhaps, be reserved for the seat adjacent to self appointed cabin class boundary riders...![]()

And Molly MeldrumPeeing on the floor should , perhaps, be reserved for the seat adjacent to self appointed cabin class boundary riders...![]()
Sorry then you haven't been listening on most of your domestic flights in Australia. VA always mention Y pax down the back and QF only occasionally miss doing that.Most don't say anything about J /F loos being reserved for like passengers. Certainly nothing in QF which is what this post started with.
Thats the Cc directive. I was referring to QF marketingVA always mention Y pax down the back and QF only occasionally miss doing that.
Most don't say anything about J /F loos being reserved for like passengers. Certainly nothing in QF which is what this post started with.
It’s actually easy to overlook as it’s in the heading rather than the general text: https://www.qantas.com/au/en/qantas-experience/travel-classes/business.htmlThats the Cc directive. I was referring to QF marketing
When I have flown they announce that for the passengers in the main cabin there are two toilets at the rear, but there is no mention of the front toilet being for business class passengers.Every single QF 737 flight I've been on they announce that the loo at the front is reserved for J pax and two are the rear for economy pax.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Based on your comments I'm not sure if you indeed do share their empathy. As an elderly person myself, and who could also be a Y pax blocked by the cart, I could find myself in a similar situation (having a wee bit less control of my bodily functions) and then be frowned upon by someone.Seen it several times on non-QF flights! Especially the WCs on wide bodies between the J and Y cabins.
Post automatically merged:
Agree… and hopefully the crew share your empathy.
Y pax blocked by cart in the aisle… not so much. Planning is the key there. Go before or after.
My posts are quite clear that those needing to use a WC for good reason should be allowed to do so. And I have never seen any behaviour by crew to the contrary. Or pax complaining in those circumstances.Based on your comments I'm not sure if you indeed do share their empathy. As an elderly person myself, and who could also be a Y pax blocked by the cart, I could find myself in a similar situation (having a wee bit less control of my bodily functions) and then be frowned upon by someone.
But there are still quite a few nice, understanding pax around in this part of the world at least, although they do seem to be a dying breed overall.
The same airline must then think that F does not need their own dedicated cabin...It’s actually easy to overlook as it’s in the heading rather than the general text:
The only difference between you and me is that I go further and say WC should be open to all passengers irrespective of class.My posts are quite clear that those needing to use a WC for good reason should be allowed to do so
Completely disagree. Just couldn’t stand entitled Emerald City people coming down and queuing for F toilet on QF A380 when I wanted to use it. If you want the resource then pay for it. Same for J and Y on domestic etc.The same airline must then think that F does not need their own dedicated cabin...
The only difference between you and me is that I go further and say WC should be open to all passengers irrespective of class.
Are you saying the front WC should be open to all passengers (regardless of class) as a carte blanche right to exercise, or just in the general sense (i.e. and people should exercise restraint and sensible conventions in doing so)?The only difference between you and me is that I go further and say WC should be open to all passengers irrespective of class.
Are you saying the front WC should be open to all passengers (regardless of class) as a carte blanche right to exercise, or just in the general sense
Hmm no, sorry to say, that is another straw man argument.A bit like saying we all have the right to say whatever we want, but that doesn't mean we all go around yelling accusatory and belligerent bile at each other, just because we can.
According the QF marketing,Completely disagree
Well I'm sorry for misrepresenting you, but I can't understand what your position is.I have never said passenger should have "carte blanche" access in any sense - the CC have complete control of the cabin. Straw man arguments do not progress the debate.
Hmm no, sorry to say, that is another straw man argument.
lol. You’re just trying it on here.According the QF marketing,
F does not have a dedicated cabin
But maybe you are referring to the 2nd paragraph, sure, this topic has polarising opinion for years.
....
View attachment 435360
Yes. Thats all I'm saying as per post #5:All I think I can ascertain is that you say that the front WC shouldn't be restricted to only J class
it's a starting point for the conduct of the cabin.Loos should be available to everyone on the airplane irrespective of ticket price.
No. I am just proposing a different way of thinking about aircraft loos.You’re just trying it on here
I agree about the announcement re which loo is for who.Sorry then you haven't been listening on most of your domestic flights in Australia. VA always mention Y pax down the back and QF only occasionally miss doing that.
I have been in Y on occasions on the 737 and the line of pax waiting for the J loo was past my seat in Row 4. On the other hand I witnessed a woman in Y with a toddler ask if she could use the J loo as she needed to change the child. Told firmly do that down the back.
Rather think we should be locking the Y toilets to keep the J passengers out.Maybe rather than locking the J toilet, we should lock this thread now....![]()