Moorabin runway might be too shortmuch quicker to get in & out of Essendon than Tulla, both for aircraft & passengers. Suggest it might be as much as 15-20 mins each way.
Moorabin runway might be too shortmuch quicker to get in & out of Essendon than Tulla, both for aircraft & passengers. Suggest it might be as much as 15-20 mins each way.
actually not many people change their flights, so it's a con to say they need flexibility. Some do sit aorund the qantas/virgin clubs for hours though. Who cares about international connections ? Don't think a startup flying Bankstown to Essedon would be at all concerend about that, although think essendon does have a regular free bus to tulla. Parramatta & surrounds ? How many million people are we talking.Don’t know about that. I suspect the high frequency traveller would still choose the big boys - these flyers often change flights at last minute. The secondary airports and startups will not service any connections incl the internationals until they go a bigger fleet. A clientele that only lives on Parramatta and surrounds won’t cut it.
Don’t forget the 2nd airport
2nd airport in Sydney? How many years away is that (7 years minimum) & way out west, plus will have same issues with security, baggage that Mascot has. Keeping aircraft MTOW under 20t makes a lot of sense.Don’t know about that. I suspect the high frequency traveller would still choose the big boys - these flyers often change flights at last minute. The secondary airports and startups will not service any connections incl the internationals until they go a bigger fleet. A clientele that only lives on Parramatta and surrounds won’t cut it.
Don’t forget the 2nd airport
Good luck to them, but it looks on face value to be a quick way to burn through cash.
Based on all the past startup failures, I won’t hold my breath.
if turboprops, they are cheap to operate & reliable. Like all airlines they'd probably have seats at all prices. Not hard to fill an aircraft, any idiot can do that by giving away seats. Jets on other hand are expensive to operate.Good luck to them, but it looks on face value to be a quick way to burn through cash.
If they can provide a reliable service, with a low number of seats needing to be filled each day to make a profit, then it has a chance.
If they need to fill 80%+ of seats, and/or cant run reliably, then they are in for a short life expectancy.
I think both of these above-mentioned statements are accurate.
My assessment is that such a venture is likely to fail, but if it were to succeed, they would need (IMHO):
1. A niche offering;
2. Suitable jets (I doubt a prop operation will attract enough punters);
3. A currently successful operation with the ability to provide life support for an extended period;
4. Competitive fares;
5. A decent marketing budget; and
6. Solid support from the proposed airports.
Comments about people paying a premium to miss SYD and MEL madness are just pipe dreams I reckon. Comments about people being happy to fly a prop over that distance is also wide of the mark IMHO. (why have VA scrapped most of their much laudered ATR 72's?)
However, I might be wrong, but I can guarantee you that I won't be investing in the concept.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Then I can’t understand why QF seem to fill their seats for WGA-SYD and ZL is rarely fullif turboprops, they are cheap to operate & reliable. Like all airlines they'd probably have seats at all prices. Not hard to fill an aircraft, any idiot can do that by giving away seats. Jets on other hand are expensive to operate.
eg. I can imagine the conversation going something like this ...
manager to assistant .... book me a flight tomorrow to MEL(from SYD) at 7am, coming home at 6pm. Price might not even be mentioned, unless the assistant is used to booking $500 fares & nothing less under say $800.
no Virgin is much better airline !!!No, more likely ... book me a flight tomorrow, make sure it's on Qantas.
Then why does QF have most of the road warrior and J flyers?no Virgin is much better airline !!!
How do you know this ?Then I can’t understand why QF seem to fill their seats for WGA-SYD and ZL is rarely full
Then why does QF have most of the road warrior and J flyers?
I knew it would come to this...![]()
lounges ?There are lots of “road warrior” types who run that route in Y but are WP who book late. They won’t be happy with “lounge” in BWU/MEB
Does the red bus stop and pickup at MEB?
How do you know this ?
.
Hence the first problem. I'm not debating the cost difference between prop and jet. My argument is that pax flying SYD-MEL expect a jet. I've heard the argument that a turbo prop may be just as quick as a jet, but I personally don't subscribe to that theory. For me, given the choice of a jet or prop, I'd much prefer a jet.if turboprops, they are cheap to operate & reliable ... Jets on other hand are expensive to operate.
Maybe it wouldn't be at a premium cost? ... manager to assistant .... book me a flight tomorrow to MEL(from SYD) at 7am, coming home at 6pm. Price might not even be mentioned, unless the assistant is used to booking $500 fares & nothing less under say $800.