I have just spent 4 phone calls (plus many hours on hold) trying to book my latest 280k Oneworld award.
As usual, this complex itinerary would not price online. I rang and was given a number of reasons why my itinerary was not valid during the various phone calls.
First, I was told that I was not allowed to backtrack - wrong.
Next, that I was only allowed five stopovers and two transits; I pointed out the rule that states that transits are unlimited.
Next, it was suggested I had too many segments; we later agreed that there were only 16 (15 flights + 1 surface sector).
Then, I was told that the last city on the itinerary (the same one that I start from) is also counted as a stopover! I pointed out that it's NOT a stopover as it is the end of the trip.
Today, I finally got onto an agent who seemed to know what he was doing. After a bit of back and forth, and waiting on hold while he discussed things with his supervisor, I was told that I had too many stopovers as a surface sector is counted as 2 stopovers. (I realise that there has been discussion of this point on this thread before.) I pointed out that this was never the case and I had previously booked a number of itineraries with surface sectors (and they only counted as one stopover) but the agent was adamant that it has been always been the case that they were counted as two.
He read out the section of the (internal) booking rules that specifically state that a surface sector is to be counted as two stopovers and noted that this document was dated 2016. He then added that some itineraries may have slipped through manually in the past but QF was now enforcing this rule; and all surface sectors are now counted as two stopovers.
If correct, this is a significant enhancement of the Oneworld Classic Awards, making them far less attractive (for me at least). Given this, the unacceptable waiting times to get through to a call centre, plus all the other inconsistencies, it is becoming increasingly difficult to like QF.