PointsTraveller!
Junior Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2022
- Posts
- 46
I’ve been charged the 5,000 points fee per person to add flights to my OWA booking. Is this correct as there is no other way to do this than on the phone?
Yes, you’d be charged this even if you could do it online. What you shouldn’t be charged is the 7700 points “International Reward Assistance Fee”.I’ve been charged the 5,000 points fee per person to add flights to my OWA booking. Is this correct as there is no other way to do this than on the phone?
The 5k change fee is normal.I’ve been charged the 5,000 points fee per person to add flights to my OWA booking. Is this correct as there is no other way to do this than on the phone?
The 5k change fee is normal.
You are referring to the service fee which is waived for J/F awards.
Thanks. Just booked last leg just booked and this is the first time they’ve charged this. Lucky me I guess.Yes, you’d be charged this even if you could do it online. What you shouldn’t be charged is the 7700 points “International Reward Assistance Fee”.
Thanks. Just booked last leg just booked and this is the first time they’ve charged this. Lucky me I guess.
Note that this charge is only when it's re-ticketed.Thanks. Just booked last leg just booked and this is the first time they’ve charged this. Lucky me I guess.
A 22 hour layover is a transit (<24 hours), not a stop. The original 37 hour layover was considered a stop (>24 hours).Sorry another question from me again!
For my upcoming classic rewards booking, my 1st and 2nd legs were as per below:
(Tuesday) Leg 1 - Melbourne to Hong Kong on CX in Economy w/ an intentional layover in HK for 37hrs
(Wednesday) Leg 2 - Hong Kong to Paris via Helsinki on AY in Business
I then called up Qantas to change the 1st leg to business on CX as I could see seats and it was successfully changed.
So now, the first 2 legs are as per below:
(Tuesday) Leg 1 - Melbourne to Hong Kong on CX in Business w/ an intentional layover in HK for 22hrs
(Wednesday) Leg 2 - Hong Kong to Paris via Helsinki on AY in Business
My itinerary has now seemed to "merge" the above 2 flights as "Melbourne to Paris", rather than Melbourne to HK and then HK to Paris. The only difference is the flight number (later the same day) and travel class from Economy to Business - no other changes.
I'm assuming that when we check in at Melbourne Airport, we just say our destination is actually HK first, and thus our luggage is then only checked to HK instead of all the way to Paris?
Not a big issue to me if it's checked all the way through to Paris as we'd have less stuff to haul around to and from the hotel during our 1 day/night in HK, we'd just have to load our carry ons with an additional change of clothes.
More so just concerned if it will affect the rest of our trip if we didn't have our luggage checked through to Paris initially as the booking says "Your flight to Paris is in xx_ days".
Oh and also, Check My Trip also says Melbourne - Paris now, instead of Melbourne to Hong Kong.
Correct - I have deleted my entire post as it was garbage.Mr H, think you may have missed the itinerary change MelbFlyer mentioned, being that the stay in HK is now 22 hours rather than 37.
MelbFlyer, this makes it a transit rather than a stopover (less than 24 hours being the distinction), which is why it has now 'merged' your itinerary. Assuming it is all on one PNR, it also means you should be able to check your bags through to CDG.
A 22 hour layover is a transit (<24 hours), not a stop. The original 37 hour layover was considered a stop (>24 hours).
"Melbourne to Paris" is correct, because you are only transiting in HKG and HEL on the way to Paris.
You can ask them to check luggage to HKG only if you wish.
MelbFlyer, this makes it a transit rather than a stopover (less than 24 hours being the distinction), which is why it has now 'merged' your itinerary. Assuming it is all on one PNR, it also means you should be able to check your bags through to CDG.
At check-in I would just say you are flying to Paris via HK and Helsinki, to avoid any misunderstanding.
@Mr H I have a merged AA trip on CMT. Would this explain why I cant get it to display my e-ticket number for that seperate booking that sits in the middle of the QF itinerary of my first booking?Checkmytrip will auto merge the display
@Mr H I have a merged AA trip on CMT. Would this explain why I cant get it to display my e-ticket number for that seperate booking that sits in the middle of the QF itinerary of my first booking?
Is it possible that AA don’t use the Amadeus system? If so, then that might be the reason.I'm not an expert, but no, I think if there are parts of the itinerary without a ticket number then the flights are not ticketed.
AA RES & DCS is hosted by Sabre - they developed it and spun it off. So maybe that is the cause. Having said that, I have a VA itinerary (who are also hosted on Sabre) in CMT and that did automatically pick a timing change on it.Is it possible that AA don’t use the Amadeus system? If so, then that might be the reason.
I looked again. It is a QF award. The old QF itinerary had e ticket numbers but AA have since moved us to a different flight and now the QF itinerary is missing e ticket numbers. So looks like it is not ticketed. I don't know how I missed it. At least AA don't cancel the booking straight away and it's been over a month. Call Centre time. (Dread)AA RES & DCS is hosted by Sabre - they developed it and spun it off. So maybe that is the cause. Having said that, I have a VA itinerary (who are also hosted on Sabre) in CMT and that did automatically pick a timing change on it.
Most Global Distribution Systems (GDS), eg Amadeus/Sabre, will have airline schedules and prices from airlines not hosted by themselves in their databases to enable travel agents/sites sales who use one system (eg Amadeus) to sell seats on carriers hosted elsewhere. They even have IATA carrier codes assigned - Amadeus - 1A,Sabre - 1S, Navitaire - 1N etc.
I don’t know what other carriers you have in your itinerary, but keep in mind that it’s not only the flight that changes that’s affected by a delay in re-ticketing; all sectors are in jeopardy.At least AA don't cancel the booking straight away
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements