The relative funding of different aspects of healthcare is a genuine concern. Off-topic: personally I think the bias towards expensive pharmaceuticals may not give us the best return on our spend. It is however terribly difficult for the PBS and Governments to stand up to intense community and vested interest lobbying for the latest oncology drugs. Often these drugs cost tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year to the taxpayer, and may give only marginal benefits to the patients (extension of life often measured in months not years).
Regarding heart disease: there is also a good-going market in novel pharmaceuticals here (think cholesterol-lowering medications, new blood pressure medications, blood thinners and anti-platelet therapies). Sometimes these also turn out to be expensive failures. Diet and exercise remain critical factors in heart disease prevention (and less so in cancer prevention) but maybe we need to be encouraging more people to walk, run and ride daily.
Maybe those FBT car rule changes wouldn't be so terrible.
Regarding uncertainty of election timing being bad for business: it appears universally accepted that the election will occur between early September and November (and the speculation in Fairfax today is on 7 September, G20 notwithstanding). Hopefully this will all be settled soon. Having lost the sweepstakes regarding election timing (I picked one of the late August dates) I propose a few new challenges.
Predictions on :
- outcome
- size of majority
- % swing against ALP in Craig Thompson's electorate (will it be higher than that achieved by Jackie Kelly in 2007!?)
Make your predictions with your heads, not your hearts, please!
Here's my attempt:
- Coalition
- 6 seats
- 7%