I am flabbergasted at how much this has got peoples backs up. Whilst sure it is not an improvement it, on the surface does seem more than reasonable.
ajw373, my flabbergasted comment related to Qantas's apparent hypocrisy in citing lounge overcrowing as a reason for removing anytime access, then offering incentives for people to join, such as the 25000 points that was announced a couple of pages ago. I think there was also a promotion a couple of months back where there were was a significant discount on joining. That's hypocrisy and that's what flabbergasted me.
I actually thought this was quite a reasonable rethink by Qantas.
I have often taken advantage of anytime access in Hobart because DJ don't have a lounge there. I've even used that lounge when getting off a Vigin flight, with guest.
With the new rules I will only have access if I arrive or depart on a QF flight. Seems good and reasonable to me. I now have a significant incentive to actually fly QF. I think that's what QF want.
froggerADL, we'll respectively disagree on this. I would note, however, that one of the biggest disappointments for Platinum members about the removal of anytime is the significant differential it provided between Gold and Platinum.
Qantas made their decision, they refined it (adding back arrival access) and they have, through Red Roo, made a comment that the use of the club then flying someone else was part of their thinking. I doubt that there is anything that Red Roo could say that is going to help.
My belief now is that the 'concession' of arrivals access was never intended to be a compromise by Qantas but was, in fact, an omission from their first email. That is, arrivals access was always intended to be announced as part of the removal of anytime access but it somehow escaped the proofreaders of the final email. I mean no disrespect to
Red Roo but I suspect the "we've listened" is not the case at all.
Name one business that provides access to their facilities when the customer is choosing to frequent another business? For example does David Jones let customers of Myer user their change rooms? Where is the difference? So why should Qantas let people (even if they have been loyal customers) use the facilities when they are, for example flying Virgin Blue, or to a lesser extent when they are not flying at all? Though in the latter case I can see the point.
All extremely selfish replies, and not one has answered the basic question as to what other business (or airline for that matter) allows people who are customers of their competitors to use their facilities just because that customer has been a good customer in the past.
ajw373, I'll give a perfect example of what I believe you're chasing: lounge access. For example, Qantas and Cathay both fly MEL-HKG and both have lounges at MEL. How many top tier QF frequent flyers who have chosen to fly CX would choose the CX lounge at MEL over the QF First Lounge? This is a fair comparison, I believe. By your thinking, QF should say to those CX passengers, 'nope, sorry, you've chosen to use our competitor over us so go use their lounge'. And the same applies in HKG. CX doesn't tell QF passengers to bugger off and use the QF lounge when their flying QF down to Australia, rather than HKG. Same example.
Similarly, QF allows points earning in their frequent flyer program when QF customers fly QF competitors. There are multiple examples of routes where both QF and another carrier exist but the earning rate is the same. These, to me, are the perfect examples to answer your question as to what other business allows people who are customers of their competitors to use their facilities just because that customer has been a good customer in the past.
There are other examples, too. Like, say, a Virgin Blue or Jetstar branded credit card that allows the owner to earn points when using their card to purchase fares on Timbuckto Airlines etc. Even in your example of David Jones, the David Jones card can still be used at Myer to earn points towards spending at David Jones. And Myer is a direct competitor.
Excellent points in your post (779) above,
dfcatch.