QF15 has just landed in HNL after diverting.
AA has up to 13 daily non stops between LAX and JFK on 3 class "A321T" (10F, 20J, 36 "Main Cabin Extra", 36Y) and more options with connections via ORD or DFW.If 'cancelled'. presumably seats have to be found for passengers in both directions on AA flights. Is this often difficult, or are there usually sufficient spare seats? A friend who travelled on these flights a while back reported that across the USA QF11 and QF12 were roughly a third full: he thought between 120 and 150 passengers on each. There must be some freight as well (apart from the self-loaders).
I took this flight through to JFK back when it was still a single 747 all the way through SYD-JFK as QF107. It was about 40% full for the JFK leg.I often wonder whether such 'tag flights' are profitable but they are probably an important part of the 'brand QF' in that New York is such an important metropolis, and it is perceived as prestigious by many airlines to fly there. It must also generate a lot of premium fare travel due to its status as a financiers' haven.
AA has up to 13 daily non stops between LAX and JFK on 3 class "A321T" (10F, 20J, 36 "Main Cabin Extra", 36Y) and more options with connections via ORD or DFW.
I took this flight through to JFK back when it was still a single 747 all the way through SYD-JFK as QF107. It was about 40% full for the JFK leg.
If QF15 has a large delay, on a day that another 747 operates to LAX (ie, QF95 or QF11 Tues), would QF pull the aircraft from SYD or MEL to fly to JFK rather then wait for QF15 and any rolling delays it would then have on the JFK and return BNE sectors?
Both SYD and MEL aircraft are A380s which don't operate the LAX-JFK sectors. The inbound BNE aircraft must operate the US Domestic leg.
The MEL-LAX-MEL flights are 93 and 94.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I wonder if another option for QF94 in situations like this, is to wait at LAX and aim to get into MEL at 0900. It seems that fog events are generally short lived and would be burnt off by the warming of sunrise.
QF11/12 is a 747 on Tuesdays (allowing the A380 to be used on SYD-DFW and make QF7/8 daily). The twice weekly second MEL-LAX flight, QF95/96 is a 747.Both SYD and MEL aircraft are A380s which don't operate the LAX-JFK sectors. The inbound BNE aircraft must operate the US Domestic leg.
The MEL-LAX-MEL flights are 93 and 94.
Quickstatus, one of our esteemed contributors - a tech crew member - referred to this in the separate thread (general discussion area) about 'some chance of fog in MEL this week'. Refer to it: I won't repeat the information here.
The delayed QF11 'tag flight' - delay due to the diversion of QF15, the B744 ex BNE, to HNL en route to LAX - departed LAX at 1312 on Thursday 2 June instead of 0820 hours, reaching JFK at 2122 hours instead of the scheduled 1640.
Turning around, it departed JFK as the usual QF12 'tag flight' at 2317 instead of 1810 hours - spending an hour and 55 minutes in 'The Big Apple', and arriving in LAX at 0117 on Friday 3 June instead of the usual Thursday mid evening 2105 hours at the LAX terminal.
QF12, the A388-operated main leg, departed LAX at 0316 hours today (Friday) instead of 2230 on late Thursday evening, so Saturday 4 June SYD arrival should be at 1045 instead of 0630 hours.
QF16 closely followed QF12 out of LAX, with the B744 departing the USA at 0328 hours on Friday morning instead of 2320 on Thursday late evening, with arrival in a potentially rainy BNE due at 0925 hours on Saturday 4 June instead of the timetabled 0620 hours. It will have picked up a bit more time than the SYD-bound flight if these estimates become reality.
As generally seems to occur when QF12 is late into LAX, the Melbourne-bound QF94 flew the coop and departed just eight minutes behind at 2223 - essentially 'on time' given the 15 minute allowance typically used in aviation RPT flights for punctuality measurement. As other AFFers explained, one reason for this is that it has a comparatively tight turnaround in MEL.