jb747
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Posts
- 12,961
Todays QF93 will also be late departing. The inbound 94 arrived at 0705
That's only 10 minutes late......in itself not enough to cause the nominated delay.
Last edited:
Todays QF93 will also be late departing. The inbound 94 arrived at 0705
For whatever reason, QF93 on Friday 30 June did not depart until 1108 (113 minutes tardy) with predicted LAX arrival at 0805, 90 minutes late.
As noted above, I agree that an 'at gate' arrival of 0710 hours for an 0915 hours timetabled A388 departure should in theory mean a punctual pushback from the gate. It was not to be.
.
My daughter was on that flight, I wonder too why it was delayed for over 2 hours
Yes, I shall my ask daughter also when she lands in LAX.. Its due at 8am PDT around 90mins late.Unusually, I had a friend on this flight so I will (in time) ask them. It would be an exaggeration to suggest that there are delays every day on QF93 but it is rather hit or miss. Not as bad as QF9 to DXB and LHR, but not nearly as good for instance as the QF7 out of SYD for DFW.
15 got into the gate late this morning. ...Then they forgot to open the secure doors into the airside corridor to CBP...
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
....
The NRT - SYD QF26 (B744 VH-OJU) is predicted to arrive at 0926 hours, 61 minutes late. Competitor JL771 was most unusually 119 minutes late so perhaps there was a major problem at NRT during the evening of Sunday 2 July. Whether JL or QF, it is very out of course for these NRT flights to run late: the route must surely have the best punctuality of any operated to and from Australia, in part because of the reputation of Japan for efficiency......