Melburnian1
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Posts
- 25,256
Re: General Qantas Delays/Cancellations/etc. Discussion
Tonight's QF10 arrival in MEL was 42 minutes late ex DXB despite having arrived in DXB on time ex LHR. This excess time in DXB may not occur every night, but it occurs sufficiently often to be a problem in enabling QF9 to depart on time given the relatively quick timetabled turnaround at night in MEL.
The QF website is having another 'night of sunny disposition' and predicting that QF9 can depart at 2320, only 25 minutes late. I suggest it will be more like 2340 or 2345 as two hours appears to be the minimum turnaround for an A388 as far as QF goes.
Is this excess time on the ground in DXB simply because that airport has become exceedingly busy with numerous EK and other A380s arriving and departing not to mention other flights, is it due to fog or sandstorms, are there often late passengers who have to be called multiple times and whose luggage cannot be quickly offloaded or is there some other typical reason? Allowing two hours 10 minutes southbound and two hours five minutes northbound to stop in DXB for 'the 10' and 'the 9' as QF staff call them is pretty generous.
While QF1 and QF9 sometimes manage to arrive at the gate at LHR on time (including the 15 minute allowable margin) or even very occasionally early, we already know from media reports that QF's LHR based manager is under pressure for QF to improve its punctuality.
QF seems pretty good - better than inbound - at getting out of LHR on time (sometimes even a few minutes early), and obviously some delays inbound will be as a result of the aircraft being in a holding pattern so that is not QF's fault, but inbound tardiness may also reflect what went on earlier in the trip.
Tonight's QF10 arrival in MEL was 42 minutes late ex DXB despite having arrived in DXB on time ex LHR. This excess time in DXB may not occur every night, but it occurs sufficiently often to be a problem in enabling QF9 to depart on time given the relatively quick timetabled turnaround at night in MEL.
The QF website is having another 'night of sunny disposition' and predicting that QF9 can depart at 2320, only 25 minutes late. I suggest it will be more like 2340 or 2345 as two hours appears to be the minimum turnaround for an A388 as far as QF goes.
Is this excess time on the ground in DXB simply because that airport has become exceedingly busy with numerous EK and other A380s arriving and departing not to mention other flights, is it due to fog or sandstorms, are there often late passengers who have to be called multiple times and whose luggage cannot be quickly offloaded or is there some other typical reason? Allowing two hours 10 minutes southbound and two hours five minutes northbound to stop in DXB for 'the 10' and 'the 9' as QF staff call them is pretty generous.
While QF1 and QF9 sometimes manage to arrive at the gate at LHR on time (including the 15 minute allowable margin) or even very occasionally early, we already know from media reports that QF's LHR based manager is under pressure for QF to improve its punctuality.
QF seems pretty good - better than inbound - at getting out of LHR on time (sometimes even a few minutes early), and obviously some delays inbound will be as a result of the aircraft being in a holding pattern so that is not QF's fault, but inbound tardiness may also reflect what went on earlier in the trip.
Last edited: