Did the change from DXB back to SIN improve QF1/2 punctuality?
I'm not sure if the "Please explain" letter from LHR about QF tardiness a few years ago made any difference?
Hard to know: it may have slightly, but we lack comparative data.
Some delays are not QFi's fault: medical diversion is the classic example. But too many others are arguably within the control of the airline, or able to be directly compared to how other international airlines operating between Oz and London, some via SIN, though most via other variants, fare.
Funny how QF1/QF2 so often spend excess time in SIN and hence arrive more than 15 minutes, and often more than half an hour, late in LHR/SYD respectively.
Yet with the exception of a blimp recorded in these pages a small number of months ago, BA15/16 largely manage to operate punctually, while operating the same route as QF1/2.
One does wonder if again, as you imply, QFi will have to have senior staff meet management at LHR given the constant missing of booked slot times, and resultant occupation of a gate at times other than scheduled.
While a bit of a 'sleeper issue', QF9/QF10 don't always cover themselves in glory timekeeping-wise either, though not as consistently delayed as 'the 1/the 2' from what one observes.