I thought this too, but was told by someone quite senior in QF fleet planning that this isn't something they have a scenario for in their plans.or even refurbed 788s coming over to QF
I thought this too, but was told by someone quite senior in QF fleet planning that this isn't something they have a scenario for in their plans.or even refurbed 788s coming over to QF
From what I have heard, mainline have never wanted the 788s.I thought this too, but was told by someone quite senior in QF fleet planning that this isn't something they have a scenario for in their plans.
I am not sure they are necessarily motivated by having as many seats as before if the yield is higher for "long and thin." I get the idea that they see the ability to run more point to point routes, with no direct competition, as the path to higher profitability. For longhaul, you can see this now with Qantas running MEL-DFW and eventually BNE-ORD on the 787, as preferable to say, double daily A380's on SYD-LAX. You can see how SYD-SFO is continually delayed as there is a competitor on that route, whereas other routes like SYD-BLR are launched in preference to say, increasing frequencies to SIN. QF9/10 to LHR has been way fewer seats that the A380 ever since it was re-routed via PER and that seems to be a winning formula, despite the LHR slot essentially costing more per passenger. Business and other time-poor travellers will pay a premium to avoid connections, and they're counting on this for regional routes with the A321XLR's and A220's as well. Long and thin is no help for the status runs though!One concern about the capex is that with the retirement of the 747s and some of the A380s even on a one-for-one replacement with 787s / A350s Qantas will still have less seats available than they did pre-COVID. I get that COVID has put a dent in their plans but it would be good to see the airline getting its act together and focusing on growth.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
They also have over 100 A321s on order for JQ and some of those will be going to QF.Just remember that according to the current order book, there are only 20 A321 XLRs on order to replace 75 B737-800s between now and 2029. The bulk of 737 replacements won't happen until well into the 2030s.
Growth of what?. Maybe profit?.the airline getting its act together and focusing on growth.
Why cheaper?. It's a profit making venture and if people are prepared to pay no need to make it cheaperIf the running cost of Alliance is cheaper, fares when booked with a QF flight number, on Alliance, should be cheaper.
I hope you're right, and that they shift them to JQ as the A350s come in.From what I have heard, mainline have never wanted the 788s.
The 787-8 have ever only been operated by JQand that they shift them to JQ as the A350s come in.
Ah, yes. Was thinking of 789 - doh!The 787-8 have ever only been operated by JQ
The same week as the UBS downgrade, Qantas launched a major tactical advertising campaign – occupying billboards, bus shelters, printed newspapers and any website trafficking in cookies – to reassure the airline’s deeply jaded customers that it would receive “1 [new] aircraft every 3 weeks over the next 3 years.”
[UBS] estimates that 70 aircraft (or 22 per cent of the Qantas fleet by number of planes) will be retired over the 2024-2028 financial years and that Qantas will need to spend $12 billion in that period just to meet its committed deliveries and replace aircraft that have reached the hoary age of 25 years old. It would cost far, far more than $12 billion to keep the fleet at its present age.
...Shareholders don’t want Qantas to be overcapitalised and so are supportive of prolonging aircraft life (with new engines and new seats).
The rest of the argument is a post-rationalisation for extreme underinvestment designed to artificially juice profits and the share price in the final years of Joyce’s reign, right before he takes his massive sack of bonuses and pulls the ripcord on his parachute, leaving the company flying into a capex mountain.
Can’t help posting this, great laugh…made my day just a little better
View attachment 323872
maybe. But both articles' main focus is the 'policy' of the current Qantas management deferring purchase of new aircraft until the last minute (this increasing average fleet age markedly) and leaving subsequent management with the issue of the expense and hit to the balance sheet.A bit rich imho.
Emirates is now flying some 777s in their latter teens for example.
But then how would they fly the (few) international routes they have? They couldn't (economically) fly PER-LHR, and the 744's would be even older (they would not have retired them if they had no 787's!) and while all 12 380's probably would still be flying, they would still have fleet age issues - I am sure the remaining 744's would have required D checks(very expensive) and of course be well over 20 years old by that time.. so the fleet age mix would still have a skew, and QF would face a cost blow out on all the 4 engined aircraft required to fly even a reasonable schedule to key destinations like UK, SIN and USA - and the maintenance and fuel costs would be far more than the 787's (and let's forget about routes like MEL-DFW and PER-LHR as I mentioned).But it's also a question of what aircraft.
Rather than buying the recent 11 789s (+3 undelivered due to Boeing issues and Covid) Qantas could probably have bought 40-50 321/737s for the same $$s.
The latter obviously would have made for a very different fleet age outcome.