raleyoz
Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Posts
- 333
Go there and see is all I can really say. But put simply and quickly it's cheap n' nasty.
Sorry i have been there, you must be clearly jaded by something else, because that is rubbish.
Go there and see is all I can really say. But put simply and quickly it's cheap n' nasty.
LAX First Class lounge. It's not even a Second class lounge. The bathrooms at Chadstone are better! Another embarrassing failure for Qantas. Why though? What are they thinking?
Go there and see is all I can really say. But put simply and quickly it's cheap n' nasty.
For me, as long as the showers are clean and available, with a decent water flow, that's OK.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
LAX First Class lounge. It's not even a Second class lounge. The bathrooms at Chadstone are better! Another embarrassing failure for Qantas. Why though? What are they thinking?
You be the judge!
Sure, I agree that the QF F bathrooms are inferior to CX The Wing's Cabanas (and serfty got in first re the 'whiteness ). Quelle horreur! But that's a silly comparison, surely? I don't think there is a lounge anywhere which matches the Cabanas. Désolé! And several of us have mentioned the noise. But to utterly condemn the place based on these issues is simply over-the-top.
Dnicoll's constructive criticisms above are far more likely to get things rectified, although the showers are probably not going to change.
For me, as long as the showers are clean and available, with a decent water flow, that's OK.
Hang on! You're saying that if it's clean and the water runs okay then that's good enough to call it an F lounge? On that basis if it ticks and keeps time it's okay to call it a Rolex. Not for my hard earned it ain't.
Btw that's not a photo of a Wing Cabana just a standard F shower room. It's equivalent to the standard of a modern 5 star hotel, it's "First Class". What Qantas has done is equivalent to a modern 3 star hotel. It is not "First Class" and just because you label it that, doesn't make it so.
PS. The water pressure was poor.
It is not "First Class" and just because you label it that, doesn't make it so.
Do you have a photo of the toilets at Chadstone for an accurate comparison?
Last time I was in the loos at Chaddy there was a lady washing a pooey baby in the sink, ignoring the parent room down the hall. I'd take the F lounge any day!
Hang on! You're saying that if it's clean and the water runs okay then that's good enough to call it an F lounge? On that basis if it ticks and keeps time it's okay to call it a Rolex. Not for my hard earned it ain't.
I think that there is a dichotomy between those who travel F, who have paid for F and expect an F experience all the way and those who are flying in other classes but are WP so are generally just happy with the extra perks.
<snip>.
Ah! Now we seem to be getting to the nub of things. Not so much the facilities but rather the WP F pretenders and other members of the great unwashed who share the F lounge with those who have paid for F (or at least paid for F on the airplane ). These type of people are happy with plain, clean white bathrooms, so QF drags down the lounge décor to their standard.
I agree; if I was paying F I certainly wouldn't appreciate such folk, with their pedestrian wants and needs, happy with some second class fit-out.