I think this is a good example. There are two basic issues hereYes! About sporting tickets! Purchased some rugby tickets the other day. Credit card surcharge was included in the quoted price. All good. Then when I select my tickets I have to choose a ticket delivery option with associated fee. A $6.15 fee for me to download and print the tickets myself. Wtf!!! Took the $7.15 option for them to post out the tickets.
What comfort? If it wasn't so pathetic I'd be screaming with laughter!
To be fair to Qantas they don't explicitly call the CC fee a comfort fee, but try to vaguely associate it with a category they call "comfort and convenience". Unfortunately (apologists aside) they fail spectacularly to fool anyone that it is anything more than an excuse to jack up the profit on the cheaper fares.
As someone else did quote the original statement from Qantas, the airline came extremely close to saying it and the only inference is that it is a convenience and comfort fee.I think this thread has died. Just disappointed that it still carries the incorrect title. Qantas never said that this was a "comfort fee". That was an invention by the usual reporters trying to make a story.
As I understand the consumer law the customer must be fully aware of any credit card charges before entering into
an agreement or contract to purchase and must be made aware of the total cost. (Eg Service Stations must display
any card surcharge on the pump )
The comfort/convenience is purely replacing the credit card charge to comply with the Australian Consumer Law.
Of course if "Entering into Agreement" is considered to be when you start the booking procedure any fees/charges coming
later are contrary to the spirit of the Act.
Who wants to take on Qantas ?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Sorry but I don't agree that the credit card surcharges should be revenue for the airline. The credit card surcharge should accurately reflect the transaction cost of paying by credit card. A credit card fee should not be revenue for the airline. If they want to make more money, they should increase fare prices and advertise the full price upfront. I do agree that it wouldn't be fair if one airline did this and not the others, but they should all be forced to do this - then the playing field would still be level.
I've just reported Jetstar to the ACCC. I direct deposited the fare to avoid the 11% gouge.
they never issued my tickets, returned my money two weeks later and cancelled my flights
Carlos admitted the remittance looked correct but refused to reinstate my cancelled flights or investigate
They don't have a failsafe method where you can avoid their gouge.
Disgusted!
I've just reported Jetstar to the ACCC. I direct deposited the fare to avoid the 11% gouge.
they never issued my tickets, returned my money two weeks later and cancelled my flights
Carlos admitted the remittance looked correct but refused to reinstate my cancelled flights or investigate
They don't have a failsafe method where you can avoid their gouge.
Disgusted!
Good on you. If more people do this, they might finally get the message.
A lot of businesses give you a discount for purchasing online instead of in person or over the phone. And no credit card surcharge.
Credit cards are a cost of doing business. How the Reserve Bank ever approved credit card surcharges is beyond me.
And I bet you that their profit margin is MUCH greater than that of an airline.
Airlines are cutthroat businesses. If you consider "profit" to be bad, then at least acknowledge that your local corner store "gouges" you a hell of a lot more than QF. As does your plumber, the supermarket, the tyre shop, and your local bottleshop