drron
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2002
- Posts
- 35,953
Can I say to odysseus and DrRon and others on this thread that I apologise for being both rude and snide.
I think that too many days on the road makes me grumpy and abrupt. I'll try to respond with a bit more grace and humour rather than being an aggressive cough.
Since I feel I have lowered the tone of the thread, maybe I can try to make amends and raise the tone.
To nlagalle: The News of the World income appears to be pocket money compared to the BSKYB deal that is at serious risk for Murdoch. Cutting loose NOTW seems to certainly be a fiscal decision in this regard. Would you agree with this?
To Pu Koh: Thanks for pulling me into line, I forget how abrupt I can be. As for the example which you supplied regarding your colleague, you described it as a win-win. Please don't think me being picky, but wasn't it a Win-Lose? A win for her, but a lose for the company?
The company paid a redundancy pay out and then employed her back. Surely the company lost?
My issue with the secondment is that I cannot see what the upside is for Qantas Mgt. This is not an altruistic decision, they would make this offer on a purely fiscal basis (for themselves).
I see Qantas as a shrinking company, and I see JetStar as a growing company. It just seems to me that if these pilots return it can only be to a Jetstar contract, not a Qantas one. What do you guys think? Would Qantas try that on, or would it be too obvious a ploy?
Once again, apologies for my previous tone.
I took no offence.I can be equally snide-and usually dont even realise it!
But I do think it is hard to circumvent the IR laws.I also think moopere is more than likely right.but just an opinion.