Unpacking the profitability discussion, just because a route is discontinued doesn't necessarily mean that it was unprofitable, it could simply mean there are more profitable opportunities out there.
Alternatively, it might well be unprofitable after accounting for overheads and the cost of the asset, but if it is more than covering (variable) operating costs it could make sense to operate the route in the short term to provide cash. Obviously the latter doesn't work in the long term, something has to give. But with the older 330's that QF use on these two routes, are these already fully depreciated, such that the asset cost is minimal anyway (compared to 787)?
Alternatively, it might well be unprofitable after accounting for overheads and the cost of the asset, but if it is more than covering (variable) operating costs it could make sense to operate the route in the short term to provide cash. Obviously the latter doesn't work in the long term, something has to give. But with the older 330's that QF use on these two routes, are these already fully depreciated, such that the asset cost is minimal anyway (compared to 787)?