elanshin
Established Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2023
- Posts
- 2,712
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Gold
- SkyTeam
- Elite Plus
2. They shouldn't even bother if they're relying on QR to under wet lease only conditions. Everything in this case relies completely on QR and how QR is doing if VA themselves have no real purpose and plan to fly Int'l.Sorry I’m really confused: are you saying 1. VA should just lease a few wide bodies and enter the international market “with conviction” or 2. they shouldn’t even bother trying and just be happy being Australia’s 2nd domestic airline because they have “no conviction” or 3. the VA/QR wet lease should be allowed forever because VA has “no conviction” and so we should just let QR get what they want?
I think we can all agree 1 is high risk and not going to happen under Bain ownership and 2 which is the status quo and is worse for consumer than what’s being proposed. Option 3 seems to suggest that the international operation is commercially sustainable which suggests it wouldn’t be a problem to transition to VA’s own operation in the same JV setting?
I dont mind having more QR flights, but lets be honest thats exactly what this is with VA being the middle man in a wet lease only agreement.