First, this contact tracing concern is not an issue. People in NSW are required to use the Service NSW app to register when entering an indoor premise. Before I tried to even check-in to the lounge the first time, I was pointed to the QR code to scan. Qantas, presumably like every other business with an indoor venue, is required to ensure visitors scan the code. Correct me if I'm wrong but 99.9% of indoor venues don't require boarding passes; they rely on the government's own, mandated tracing app. I was specifically asked to show the lounge agent that I had scanned. Again, this was all before the hullabullu about arrivals access. It's simply not about contact tracing.
Second, I've been thinking a bit about whether I was 'sticking it' to the lounge manager. I'm not sure if I was or not. I definitely wanted to enter the lounge and under the benefits of the program I had every right to. Certainly I can understand if it sounds like I was.
I’m with
@muppet here.
Regardless of the previous published benefits QF staff seem to have had a directive that lounge access on arrival is being suspended during this period due to COVID restrictions etc.
Many of these staff including Janet have been furloughed for months and they are now back and just trying to do their job.
“Sticking it” to them by booking an award seat that was never intended to travel but just to circumvent their refusal of lounge access is something I would never personally do.
I can’t think of any time I’d be that insistent on proving a point.
Those previously published benefits are still published:
Access Domestic Business Lounges or the Qantas Club upon arrival if you have travelled that day on any flight with a Qantas (QF), Jetstar Airline (JQ, 3K, GK or BL, for travel on BL until 28 July 2020), Emirates (EK), China Eastern (MU)or a oneworld® member airline flight number on your ticket.
Frequent Flyer - Flying Qantas and Partner Airlines - Status Credits and Tier Benefits - Tier Benefits
I don't think 3.2 overrides 7.1.
If QF made a mistake or otherwise failed to comply with its end of the bargain, that wouldn't then allow passengers to do the things in 7.1 to 'fix' that error. You'd need to take that up elsewhere through the correct channels.
I believe I could defend myself against a claim of breaching this section.
...
As per the link in my previous post in thread. Qantas have published on their website that there are capacity restrictions for the lounges. Stopping arrival access is a capacity restriction.
Well except there hasn't been a change to QFF. This is a temporary access restriction due to a worldwide pandemic, a restriction that has been advertised.
Qantas have annouced that there are restrictions due to Covid. That's on the website.
What other update do you expect? Arrivals access hasn't been removed as a benefit, it's just not being provided temporarily at the moment. I'm really struggling to understand the issue, the benefit is just subject to special restriction at the moment and those have been added to the website. The same way some lounges are closed - being closed doesn't mean they're going to permanently remove the lounge
It seems Qantas say it's due to "capacity restrictions". And that a guest "may" be refused. I suppose that's fair enough if the lounge really is getting to capacity.
But it's
not about capacity. As I mentioned in my original post, there were less than 50 people in the lounge (probably more like 30). If I was denied because of capacity
and that was indeed the case (unlike, what, the CX lounge at SFO that used to deny QF passengers?), then no issue whatsoever. As for temporary, I highly doubt that's the case.
Although I am not sure what aspect of 7.1 you think has been breached here, other than maybe being rude to Janet (if that indeed happened)
I may have been
marginally rude and that certainly wasn't the intention.
Could come under the 'abuse or misuse' of an award as there was no intention to travel, and the award was only booked for the purpose of circumventing access rules.
The OP knew the policy was likely in place, having responded to this thread on 22 December. Would the OP have done the same thing if there had been a 5000 cancellation penalty in place?
There could well be an argument for that.
As for the "policy" being in place, no, I did not know, nor do I know now. In addition to seeing nothing on the QF website, I was not told by the lounge manager that it was "policy" or that all lounges were denying arrivals access at this time.
No, I would not have taken the course of action is the 6K penalty was in place but I would have pushed the point further, either with the lounge manager or over the phone.
Covid is the perfect excuse to cut back on almost everything. Due to covid, due to covid, due to covid.
Whatever way you skin it - there's a removal of a Platinum benefit in place, and it seems most folks are accepting it without a fight.
Make no mistake folks, Qantas won't bring this back as a stated benefit in the future if it's removed now. Think of 'covid-times' as a trial run for arrivals access removal. When the world opens up again, the next excuse QF will be 'alignment with oneworld', or 'ongoing capacity issues' or some equally convenient excuse.
Good on you
@Danger for standing up to the madness.
It's the tip of the iceberg, for sure.
There's plenty of commentary in the lack of spirits in J thread, a thread I added to just a few days ago. 'Sorry, sir. No spirits to limit contact with passengers. But I can offer you a red, a sparkling ...'