CaptainCurtis
Established Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2013
- Posts
- 1,418
I've boarded flights where refuelling was still in progress...Then told we’re diverting to Christchurch to refuel, but they’ll be refuelling with passengers onboard?
I’ve always thought it was prohibited, but agree that I have been on flights that have boarded with refuelling in progress.I've boarded flights where refuelling was still in progress...
I’ve always thought it was prohibited, but agree that I have been on flights that have boarded with refuelling in progress.
I assume they need more fuel than what they are allowed to take off from Zqn withRemaining onboard while refueling is not new (you’re asked to leave seatbelt undone). But why the need to refuel in Christchurch? Isn‘t Christchurch further Than Queenstown?
Remaining onboard while refueling is not new (you’re asked to leave seatbelt undone). But why the need to refuel in Christchurch? Isn‘t Christchurch further Than Queenstown?
So sending a text messaging saying a flight is cancelled when it’s not is acceptable?Can Qantas get any worse for refuelling their aircraft?? Geez...
Happens nearly on every domestic turn where refuelers are doing their thing whilst passengers are on board.
Not sure how that is a bad thing. Fuel is good from my POV.Can Qantas get any worse for refuelling their aircraft
Not sure how that is bad either, if a message gets sent but shortly after a subsequent update message also sent.Yikes can Qantas get any worse?
There is a strong weather system out in the Tasman sea. QF122 possibly accounting for easterly headwinds and short ZQN runway 1800m vs 3200m.I assume they need more fuel than what they are allowed to take off from Zqn
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
and at a different altitude and prevailing weather conditions. Lots of things factor into performance limits for flights.It is, but as @kpc says, the CHC runway is significantly longer then the one at ZQN.
You literally got sent a text message straight after saying it's not and being operated via CHC.So sending a text messaging saying a flight is cancelled when it’s not is acceptable?
It isn't a bad thing at all!Not sure how that is a bad thing. Fuel is good from my POV.
Just part of rapid aircraft turnarounds.
Ive been on lots of aircraft when refuelling is underway.
There is a non smoking sign on and the airbridge remains in place and the doors open
Would this be related to the polar blast sweeping through SE Australia and out across the tasman?
No, the second message came through 30 minutes after the original cancellation text. The flight was also showing as cancelled in my Qantas app for an hour. Straight after I received the first text, I called Qantas only to be told the wait time would be 60-90 minutes. So for thirty minutes I was frantically trying to make plans to get home, given I have work tomorrow and there is only one daily flight back to Sydney. It is unacceptable.You literally got sent a text message straight after saying it's not and being operated via CHC.
So you'd rather the flight cancelled then?No, the second message came through 30 minutes after the original cancellation text. The flight was also showing as cancelled in my Qantas app for an hour. Straight after I received the first text, I called Qantas only to be told the wait time would be 60-90 minutes. So for thirty minutes I was frantically trying to make plans to get home, given I have work tomorrow and there is only one daily flight back to Sydney. It is unacceptable.
I never said that. I said it is unacceptable to be texting passengers telling them their flight has been cancelled when it has, in fact, not been cancelled. Chatting to people at check-in and in the lounge now, every person has shared my sentiment.So you'd rather the flight cancelled then?