Funnily enough I still think of flying when I hear Rhapsody in Blue (UA).. that's far sadder than any attachment to QF!
Seriously though many of us, depending on our generation, will equate QF as *THE* national flag carrier. Because up to about the 90's it pretty much was QF and there's a certain home town loyalty inherent to most of us I think. A bit like as a Victorian I support a Victorian football team rathe rthan one from WA or QLD.
I do think though these are historic ties but most of us are pragmatic enough and also in a position (eg: have LTG) to recognise this and find what works for us at the lowest cost. Much like nobody buys(and makes) Oz cars anymore.
and despite everything, I'd rather hang in your average QC than a UA Club and we do forget that the service levels Australia receives, specially domestic, are still way more than most of the world get. QF has a product that has gone downhill absolutely, but they generally run a decent schedule that is reliable. I'm flying to BNE over the weekend and I don't really consider that a delay is very likely. Surethey happen, but it's not the norm for QF domestic, and if it is, often it's stuff like the weather (hello SYD) affecting ops rather than tech issues or stuff specifically within QF's control (yes I know the 717 and 744 fleet are not doing so great).
One key thing for me is reliability and that I get where I want, when i want. QF, more or less, delivers on that through hundreds of flights I can only count on one, or maybe both, hands the number of real issues that have happened over the past few decades. That's a pretty decent record IMHO. Not to say that other carriers are much worse mind you, though there are many more out there with far worse reliability and safety records.
That doesn't mean I'm wedding to QF, but I'd rather stay with them vs VA - yes partly due to LTG - but also because the grass isn't specifically that much greener over there. This is domestically speaking of course. International, it's a whole other ball game. and yes, I to o vote with my $$$. Next month it's NZ to the USA, a few months back it was MH/SQ/TG. However I'm also looking at the current QF sale with a view to a flight or two. That's just me.
Luckily we live in a country and environment with quite a bit of choice, and that's a good thing.
Funnily enough I still think of flying when I hear Rhapsody in Blue (UA).. that's far sadder than any attachment to QF!
Seriously though many of us, depending on our generation, will equate QF as *THE* national flag carrier. Because up to about the 90's it pretty much was QF and there's a certain home town loyalty inherent to most of us I think. A bit like as a Victorian I support a Victorian football team rathe rthan one from WA or QLD.
I do think though these are historic ties but most of us are pragmatic enough and also in a position (eg: have LTG) to recognise this and find what works for us at the lowest cost. Much like nobody buys(and makes) Oz cars anymore.
and despite everything, I'd rather hang in your average QC than a UA Club and we do forget that the service levels Australia receives, specially domestic, are still way more than most of the world get. QF has a product that has gone downhill absolutely, but they generally run a decent schedule that is reliable. I'm flying to BNE over the weekend and I don't really consider that a delay is very likely. Surethey happen, but it's not the norm for QF domestic, and if it is, often it's stuff like the weather (hello SYD) affecting ops rather than tech issues or stuff specifically within QF's control (yes I know the 717 and 744 fleet are not doing so great).
One key thing for me is reliability and that I get where I want, when i want. QF, more or less, delivers on that through hundreds of flights I can only count on one, or maybe both, hands the number of real issues that have happened over the past few decades. That's a pretty decent record IMHO. Not to say that other carriers are much worse mind you, though there are many more out there with far worse reliability and safety records.
That doesn't mean I'm wedding to QF, but I'd rather stay with them vs VA - yes partly due to LTG - but also because the grass isn't specifically that much greener over there. This is domestically speaking of course. International, it's a whole other ball game. and yes, I to o vote with my $$$. Next month it's NZ to the USA, a few months back it was MH/SQ/TG. However I'm also looking at the current QF sale with a view to a flight or two. That's just me.
Luckily we live in a country and environment with quite a bit of choice, and that's a good thing.
I have been flying Qantas since 1974 long before QFF, and probably any airline FF programs were introduced and then just when Qantas rolled out their FF program I found myself living overseas and whilst still undertaking extensive flying I was not able to utilise Qantas for it. Once back in Australia I started fly QF again and am now close to LTG status and despite having been Platinum FF status for many years due to circumstances beyond my control I have become stuck in Silver status land for the second year now. Despite this I will continue to fly Qantas because I still need to get where I am going and to me that is the whole point, you fly because you have to surely not to because you want to spend Thousands of dollars chasing status? Finally it is my experience that the vast majority of high status frequent flyers have gotten there on other peoples money i.e. an employer be they private or Government or as a self employed legitimate tax deduction.
Last edited: