I think we've had plenty of discussions of this kind on AFF. It always keeps coming back to the fact that there are too many Platinums through PER who will crowd the J lounge anyway (or at least make for a somewhat deserted QP). Suffice to say, what's not to claim SYD and CBR don't have the same problem (or even BNE for that matter, but we all know the BNE J Lounge is too small - I've been told that is being "addressed").
And that I think stands as a valid reason not to let P1s (or any non-CL for that matter) into the CLs by gazetted policy. It's not anything about P1s not taking up extra space, it's just a matter of preserving the whole idea of what CL is about (and, to be fair, it's more than just an exclusive lounge set).
I'm not sure how many people actually brought up whether P1 had sufficient incentive and benefits for those who attained the level. I know it was raised during a round of questioning, and the answer seemed to be positive, but there's still a difference between a P1 from AFF and one that isn't. So if P1s are not happy about their lounge situation, I'm guessing there must be something else to be offered, but access to CLs is pushing the envelope a bit (and I will re-emphasise here that this pushing has nothing to do with the practical aspect of the proposal).
The CL in CBR is the nicest of the three QL lounges. Has the good view over the tarmac and green hills, rather than the carpark aspect of the J lounge. Gets a good deal of traffic, as you'd expect with all Federal MPs being courtesy members and so many movers and shakers and celebs coming through Canberra. I'd guess that Sydney would be a match in terms of traffic, at least when Parliament's sitting.
The J lounge, at least from my old days when I had ATA isn't that crowded as the QP. Both are huge, but even with a lot of WP and J travellers, I think there's incentives at both ends to escape the J lounge, with some eligible being guested into the CL and others accepting the better view and enhanced conviviality of the QP.
I think QL has got the mix exactly right. The CL concept gives a level of exclusivity that cannot be bought and is under QF's control. That is insanely attractive to some people. It also gives Qantas the ability to host celebrities and others deemed deserving in comfort and privacy.
P1 lifts the game. It's one thing to fly enough to make WP, and as has been pointed out, it's only a couple of thousand dollars and a chunk of flying, but the P1 requirements make that course uneconomical. You have to fly a lot of QF to get there and pay the fuel fines and higher taxes, rather than just book a bunch of AA YUPs or whatever.
The practical benefits aren't that good IMHO. Not unless you do a lot of flying and are heavily committed to Qantas. I'm inclined to look on any QF points after WP as wasted effort when other programs, such as AA or even Virgin, offer many practical benefits.
However, for the enthusiastic Qantas traveller, P1 represents a level that lifts them out of the Hi-Vi and planespotter crowd.
My perception of the QL folk encountered last Tuesday was that they were very bright people and they weren't sharing all their secrets with us. They have a lot to do with the success or failure of the company and in these days when there is heavy competition from overseas carriers their jobs cannot be easy. As a child of the Cold War, I never imagined that the best way to London might be on a Chinese Communist airline, but there it is. Qantas needs to sell a few intangibles to make the hip-pocket hit bearable.
And they are doing it well. The Neil Perry hookup is a big positive. The food and drink at the pointy end is important. I don't know what I'd get on China Southern, but I'm sure it wouldn't be as good. The lounges are excellent. I've experienced a few of the oneWorld flagship lounges, and the only one that comes close to the standard of the Sydney Flounge is The Wing.
Cultural aspects are vital, and Qantas is very Australian. A little stuffy in a Commonwealth Club-ish way compared to (say) DJ, but QL knows what makes Skippies like me comfortable. Whether that's enough in our changing society is debatable, but it works for now.
QL, I think, was as keen to hear from us as we were to have our questions answered. Keener, maybe. I suspect that if they had announced lunch with Neil Perry at Rockpool, access to the CL and a chance to ask questions of the QL team, pay your own way plus a hundred dollars, they'd have gotten their twenty in a flash. To give away flights, hotel stays (and Sofitel Wentworth rooms are not to be sneezed at) and an excellent lunch says a lot.
Perth's problems will be addressed in good time, I'd say. It takes time to get new lounges and destinations into the pipeline, and Qantas is struggling a bit with the fleet and other resources. But they are listening, and in any relationship listening is important.