33kft
Established Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2018
- Posts
- 1,993
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
Twitter post from a passenger on the flight:
Last edited:
Although SQ seems to have more than its fair share (although that could be because they do have 20+ flights each direction each day across the Bay of Bengal which is where they tend to be most problematic).Let me know when you find an airline that doesn't experience turbulence.
I think there definitely some staff and passengers disabled or severely injured for life from that flight. No fatalities but I'd consider a disability for life pretty close.But Qantas had an incident with an A330 off WA when the aircraft went into an uncommanded descent and passengers went through the ceiling. Does the pure good fortune that no one was killed render them "failsafe"?
Sounds like a passenger rather than crew who was killed. RIP.
It's all about probability of statistics and playing the game right. If something similar were to happen to Qantas I'd reduce the safety tax down to $30 unless they upgrade their inflight experience by $20 for me to break evenBut Qantas had an incident with an A330 off WA when the aircraft went into an uncommanded descent and passengers went through the ceiling. Does the pure good fortune that no one was killed render them "failsafe"?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I thought you were trolling...its hard to be THAT ill informed.It's all about probability of statistics and playing the game right. If something similar were to happen to Qantas I'd reduce the safety tax down to $30 unless they upgrade their inflight experience by $20 for me to break even
Well no normal person would be googling this kind of statistics unless it were presented directly to them. Hence the only source for me was from Air Crash Investigations from Nat Geo. Those were definitely prime time material still remember it to this day (rest of the TV channels are dead on any given day)I thought you were trolling...its hard to be THAT ill informed.
Also CNA reporting a second (unconfirmed) death:
Thai news outlet Khao Sod has reported that there has been a second death, citing a Thai source.
More worried about te people sleeping lying flat on J (imagine justifying wearing your seatbelt on the lie back seats in J (can you imagine?))Sad news.
I'm amazed at the number of people unbuckled while sitting. Everything can happen so quickly. Some people pay way too much importance on perceived comfort. Same walking around the cabin barefoot.
It's all about probability of statistics and playing the game right. If something similar were to happen to Qantas I'd reduce the safety tax down to $30 unless they upgrade their inflight experience by $20 for me to break even
You know what they always say: Better to be "safe" than "sorry". No regrets that way (hopefully). And justifiable too.This makes no sense to me; I must be a bit dim.
What is the probability of statistics?
A safety tax - really?
Qantas is upgrading their inflight experience - not on your life - and the probability of statistics?
I put on the seatbelt when i sleep. Then again i don't move too much and i also don't tighten it all the way. Enough that it holds me in the seat but not enough to be like a car seatbelt.More worried about te people sleeping lying flat on J (imagine justifying wearing your seatbelt on the lie back seats in J (can you imagine?))
OK enough for me to continue to fly with them since it is still breaking even paying my $50 safety taxThis makes no sense to me; I must be a bit dim.
What is the probability of statistics?
A safety tax - really?
Qantas is upgrading their inflight experience - not on your life - and the probability of statistics?
Have you perhaps bumped your head strongly?More worried about te people sleeping lying flat on J (imagine justifying wearing your seatbelt on the lie back seats in J (can you imagine?))