- Joined
- Oct 13, 2013
- Posts
- 15,346
Seat belt over the blanket?This just reinforces the checking of my kids belts while they sleep under a blanket on a flat bed.
Avoiding consequences of a death onboard.
i heard someone on the radio who had a family member (from Adelaide) onboard say the seatbelt came on then instantly the turbulence struck.
I also seatbelt over blanket. Its also more comfortable with more cushioning.Seat belt over the blanket?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
So hard to keep it on them when they are little too, not just because they aren't keen, but also because its a big belt on a tiny body.This just reinforces the checking of my kids belts while they sleep under a blanket on a flat bed.
Me too, also as a curtesy to the crew. Because on many airlines, they have to check whether you’re strapped or not and it’s only fair not to make them fiddle around with your blanket first. And the benefit for myself is that they don’t have to wake me up (though that’s probably going to happen anyway if the turbulence is bad enough, I’m a very light sleeper).I also seatbelt over blanket. Its also more comfortable with more cushioning.
Is paywalledop-ed
Also on SMH etcIs paywalled
Damn. Normally non-subscribers can log in for free and view a limited number of articles. You can't do that?Is paywalled
Clickbait - and you clickedDon't you love the news.com.au Murdoch press - if you saw this you'd think he was on the plane but no he was in the Bangkok terminal
View attachment 385915
If a sudden drop in altitude results in people's heads hitting the ceiling, what would that potentially do a person laying down? Would be some serious horizontal whiplash that could be pretty damaging.
So half your weight on the strap. Might be uncomfortable, but I doubt that it would do any harm.
Makes for a great physics acceleration question. Exactly the same ilustration I saaw on my final exam (probably same publisher)Would be interesting to know if F/Jpax were among those injured.
Most of these pax their legs would also be in the "tunnel" if lying flat.
View attachment 385882
Oh- that’s a great one!Thank you - flying J and F can, therefore, be justified on Safety grounds.
Damn. Normally non-subscribers can log in for free and view a limited number of articles. You can't do that?
Would be interesting to know if F/Jpax were among those injured.
Hope the attached pdf works