Still considering they signed up 21 days before the spreadsheet was advertised, it might be safe to assume they didn't sign up just to get access to the spreadsheet. :idea: Unless perhaps they have the vision.
Snowballs chance they work for VA then
Still considering they signed up 21 days before the spreadsheet was advertised, it might be safe to assume they didn't sign up just to get access to the spreadsheet. :idea: Unless perhaps they have the vision.
MarkD, not sure if this was for me? I earned my status if it was, ignore this if it wasn'tStatus Match?
:mrgreen:
Thread! Why won't you just die!!!
this could border on discrimination
MarkD, not sure if this was for me? I earned my status if it was, ignore this if it wasn't
Thread! Why won't you just die!!!
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
On that speculative note I think I need to request access to find out!Wouldn't it be funny if after all this the OP got access to the spreadsheet and it turned out it was cough! :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Lobo76:
Hey Alister, the reason is to ensure that Virgin employees do not access the information and use it to reduce status run opportunities. As far as I know the mods are fully onboard with this, ;please feel free to raise it with them. As a community resource I'm merely keeping community standards.
There is no silver bullet, but thinking that VA staff haven't already seen this sheet would be almost 100% incorrect.
I know for a *fact* VA staff have seen it. Clearly, they are different staff to others that may make the decision to close a loophole, but they have seen it.I would suggest that statement is in fact 100 percent incorrect, members who have been here since the early years of the decade have likely been consulted , coupled with the anecdotal evidence that the runs are still in existence compared to previous runs disappearing in minutes of being published, which in itself demonstrates the sheets value.
I know for a *fact* VA staff have seen it. Clearly, they are different staff to others that may make the decision to close a loophole, but they have seen it.