Pushka
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2011
- Posts
- 29,008
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Red
So the usual now $25k we plebs have to follow doesn’t apply here?Those things are bl**dy criminal!
My brother was doing the same until he retired in July.
So the usual now $25k we plebs have to follow doesn’t apply here?Those things are bl**dy criminal!
My brother was doing the same until he retired in July.
Someone is now going to explain this to us now and p!ss us "plebs" of even more!!!So the usual now $25k we plebs have to follow doesn’t apply here?
Pollies look after themselves. There is a species of pollies who look after constituents but must be like the Tasmanian Tiger - is it extinct or not?Someone is now going to explain this to us now and p!ss us "plebs" of even more!!!
Someone is now going to explain this to us now and p!ss us "plebs" of even more!!!
IFM Investors - Asset Portfolio
All you airport lurkers and road warriors are nicely contributing to my super.
Look up the assets that my industry super is earning an income from. I should say “Thank You” . I should not neglect to thank all those consumers about to use electricity in NSW this morning
Is it true that withdrawals from these defined benefit funds are liable to income tax when in pension phase?
Correct - at standard tax rates, less a 10% rebate (it was formulated as part of the Costello 2006/7 tax-free super changes).
It is because they were 'untaxed' schemes - ie. the contributions were never taxed at the usual 15%.
I think most, if not all, would be history now.
They are history in terms of new members but there are still a fairly large number of public servants in the original CSS and of course an even larger number who will be drawing pensions for years to come and a residual to their spouse. The CSS closed to new members in 1990. The PSS only closed in 2005 and I am pretty sure that was a defined benefit which could pay a pension.Correct - at standard tax rates, less a 10% rebate (it was formulated as part of the Costello 2006/7 tax-free super changes).
It is because they were 'untaxed' schemes - ie. the contributions were never taxed at the usual 15%.
I think most, if not all, would be history now.
................The PSS only closed in 2005 and I am pretty sure that was a defined benefit which could pay a pension................
I miss the days of privately managed superannuation. Not a lot went wrong and all profits stayed in the fund.Super is a very long term investment. It should be invested at least partially into long term assets not speculative shares
i assume you mean 1) if Labor gets in (pretty definite I would think, but you never know) and 2) if they get the change through (less certain imho). Ok so assuming those two things then yes - you will have a two tiered system where those who can offset the ic against their tax will still get a benefit, but those who can’t won’t. I am sure there will be a lot of restructuring going on to ensure people can get as much benefit as possible from the franking credits. Any distribution you pay yourself (as long as it doesn’t go too high) will be tax free but any excess franking credits are lost.Interesting rehash of Labor strategy to cut Imputation credits as of 1/7/2019.
Excess franking credits: Shorten shortchanges millions of retirees
We seem to have cut him off in his tracks by pretty much collapsing our super fund and moving to HESTA. Still have a slab of cash to distribute but have to wait until our tax return is finalised.
I have a question.
If I don’t earn any PAYG salary and receive a franked distribution from our business (after July next year), the IC will pay any tax liable for that distribution but I just won’t get any excess returned as cash?
There are all sorts of options available - e.g. keeping shares that are long term holds and pay franking dividends in personal names, so the excess franking credits can be used to offset investment property rent. Keep stocks that are more short term and will be sold in the super fund so no tax on any capital gain. It certainly changes the investment thesis when looking at returns on stocks.Can't say I have seen any sensible options other than kissing most of it goodbye.
There are always structural machinations available and they usually (imo) result in more harm than good