That depends on when in Q4 the supply arrives and if it can be brought forward at all.With the extra vaccine supply announced today, we may even have everyone done by the end of the year.
That depends on when in Q4 the supply arrives and if it can be brought forward at all.With the extra vaccine supply announced today, we may even have everyone done by the end of the year.
It’s about communication though isn’t it? If the Govt doesn’t explain the detail then of course people will become concerned. And they have made a huge deal about locally produced AZ will be our savior so we aren’t beholden to import issues. Well, we are!It seems like the ability to order the extra Pfizer doses (20 million) was built into the original 20 mill dose contract the federal government signed with Pfizer.
The critics are looking more and more foolish to me ...
It’s about communication though isn’t it? If the Govt doesn’t explain the detail then of course people will become concerned. And they have made a huge deal about locally produced AZ will be our savior so we aren’t beholden to import issues. Well, we are!
20 M doses is OK, not delivered until Q4 not so OK (or should I say 'promised' to deliver, given we now know promised to deliver doesn't mean actually delivered).20 million extra doses ordered, bringing total of Pfizer to 40 million. All this year.
Is that ok?
20 million vaccinations when it won't be delivered until Q4, I suspect not. Even if delivered day 1 of Q4, that's 1.5 million a week, that seems far fetched.What's the rush? No-one is going anywhere for a long time while numbers look like this;
Worldwide cases 132,975,564 Increase 557,147
Worldwide deaths 2,886,571 Increase 14,133
This is the comparison table that I am happy that Australia is languishing at the bottom of.
And the only COVID we have, is that which we are importing.
With the extra vaccine supply announced today, we may even have everyone done by the end of the year.
20 million extra doses ordered, bringing total of Pfizer to 40 million. All this year.
Is that ok?
Secondly, getting out that quantity (What's phase 2B - 6.5million adults?) of Pfizer across the nation is going to be a significant logistical effort, and considering how that's going so far, forgive us for not nailing anything on that promise.
Hopefully we'll be around total 40M doses by day 1, Q4.20 million vaccinations when it won't be delivered until Q4, I suspect not. Even if delivered day 1 of Q4, that's 1.5 million a week, that seems far fetched.
pharmac_ was to start 2A, and how do the 'inefficient' GP and pharmac_ network do the bulk of the flu (and other) vaccination heavy lifting year after year?inefficient GP and pharmac_ plan when 2B
The issue here is not and was never whether we could order more doses, Pfizer is a business who would never turn down orders. But can they deliver in a politically acceptable timeline, I’d say not. This has always been the concern and it doesn’t look foolish to me, in fact I’d go so far as to say not having concerns about the timeline is what’s foolish. If, as increasingly looks likely, overseas countries get to full vaccination and start to open up for travel while we don’t there will be plenty of unhappy people out there.The critics are looking more and more foolish to me ...
"Plenty of", personally I think it will be more like a few. Certainly not enough to make say an electoral difference. IMHO there will be very little pressure to travel overseas before 2023 based on the people I talk to both from our family, the local community and business contacts. People like myself who are desperately keen to travel for family reunion are not likely to be in large enough numbers to provide any real pressure, it will be the airlines, travel agents etc making the most noise.The issue here is not and was never whether we could order more doses, Pfizer is a business who would never turn down orders. But can they deliver in a politically acceptable timeline, I’d say not. This has always been the concern and it doesn’t look foolish to me, in fact I’d go so far as to say not having concerns about the timeline is what’s foolish. If, as increasingly looks likely, overseas countries get to full vaccination and start to open up for travel while we don’t there will be plenty of unhappy people out there.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I'm right there with you @OATEK."Plenty of", personally I think it will be more like a few. Certainly not enough to make say an electoral difference. IMHO there will be very little pressure to travel overseas before 2023 based on the people I talk to both from our family, the local community and business contacts. People like myself who are desperately keen to travel for family reunion are not likely to be in large enough numbers to provide any real pressure, it will be the airlines, travel agents etc making the most noise.
pharmac_ was to start 2A, and how do the 'inefficient' GP and pharmac_ network do the bulk of the flu (and other) vaccination heavy lifting year after year
That is perfectly understandable. But I have to believe that we can travel next year. I've got my sons wedding to go to! By hook or by crook. I cannot give up that thought.My main motivation to get vaccinated is to travel overseas to see family. If that can’t happen, and it certainly looks like it will be a long time and well into 2022 before I can go visit, then I am in no rush to get any vaccination at all.
I’m a healthy 60 year old, and I have a 1b access because I am a volunteer firefighter. I had already decided not to use that access and just wait my tun (age based) because I thought that other people needed the shot more than I did.
Now I am feeling quite a bit of vaccine hesitancy. Not because I am worried about blood clots, but more because we don’t really know what other side effects are out there given the short timeframe and relatively small cohorts in the original clinical trials. My attitude would be different if COVID were rampant here, but it just is not. And if I can’t leave the country to see my boy, then I don’t really see much point rushing in just now to get vaccinated. I do feel a bit “sacrificial lamb” about this decision that it’s ok for 50+ to get AZ on the basis of our higher risks of COVID complications than inyounger age groups. However, as things currently stand, living in ACT, taking personal responsibility for social distancing and hand hygiene, with my health status, and unable to travel overseas, my personal risk of getting COVID is miniscule and likely lower than the risk of the blood clots. Plus I know I am a lot fitter and healthier than many of my age cohort (thank you CrossFit!), so I don’t see how my benefit from the vaccine (with know risks emerging) is enough to outweigh my risks of COVID (pretty well non-existent - and if no COVID, then certainly no COVID disease/complications).
Before all this, I was keen. Now not so much. Think I will now be a late adopter.
ACT government expected to offer COVID shots in the workplace to teachers - or at least they were planning to until the thing yesterday with the AZ and the under 50's. I suppose now that some teachers will have to get the Pfizer, the arrangements will have to change.Way more people need to get Covid vaccinations than opt into the flu shot. Also a huge proportion of people who get flu shots also get them at their place of employment, something not being offered for Covid (unless you work at a hospital or aged care facility) - because of the staged roll-out.
Most GP clinics only do some vaccinations, if you need yellow fever for example there is generally only a handful of travel clinics in each state where you need to go to get it. Pharmacies and GPs don't have the right type of refrigeration for Pfizer.
Pharmacies also unlikely to have room to provide socially distanced seating for you to be observed following the jab for the required 15 minute period, and less equipped to deal with anaphylactic reactions vs a vaccination hub which can have a doctor on site in addition to the nurses (not a pharmacist) giving the injections.
Centralized hubs can easily be designed to have the right storage, right staffing levels, plenty of space etc. The states are already moving to this model before the Pfizer announcement because it makes much more sense.
Old people generally have more health issues so are likley to have a regular GP. Similarly people with young children in daycare who constantly pick up bugs also have a regular doctor. But many younger adults don't have need to regularly see a GP and would find it much easier to go to a hub and not worry about having to be put on the books as a patient or calling random surgeries to try make an appointment.
pharmac_ was to start 2A, and how do the 'inefficient' GP and pharmac_ network do the bulk of the flu (and other) vaccination heavy lifting year after year?As originally planned, to have 50 million doses administered, especially regionally, this will continue to be a multi-pronged albeit modified approach including hubs if required