AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Buzz, are you signed on when you've tried to open it? If so, maybe log out and then try.
I'll give that a go.Buzz, are you signed on when you've tried to open it? If so, maybe log out and then try.
Struggling to use your Frequent Flyer Points?
Frequent Flyer Concierge takes the hard work out of finding award availability and redeeming your frequent flyer or credit card points for flights.
Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, the Frequent Flyer Concierge team at Frequent Flyer Concierge will help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.
Isn't that like saying you were speeding up to the accident but at point of impact you werent speeding (because you'd crashed!) so the speeding beforehand isn't taken into account? I expect the prosecution simply didn't present it properly in evidence.By the prosecution whose case was about the period of the accident and not the period prior to the accident when he got the alerts. Basically they said he knew he had low blood sugar when he rammed into the beer garden. But at the time he was obviously in a coma with a sugar level of 1.1 and so he could not have known that he was heading toward the pub. Of course does not excuse the fact that as a long term diabetic he should have known better and not driven. But the magistrate said the prosecutions case was not about that
Slightly different in thos case as the prosecutor was of the view that when blood sugar was 1.1 the driver was still voluntarily driving.but at point of impact you werent speeding